you lost credibility in the OP but this... this is like launching a missile on your own foot and posting pics

just in case you were not flame baiting, realistic graphics are far harder to achieve than your "artistic" SF style

It would also be better if people stop to say that graphics does not matter. They matter. Put a black Mario without his moustach instead of the plumber we all know and we will see if graphics does not matter to some of Nintendo guys.

Graphics matter for everyone, it's the technical side of things that you don't care about. There's a difference.

Barman looks good as fuck on it. I don't want your money. You are dodging your own Op and people here are telling you they have seen mind blowing games after PS3/360 up till now. The point isn't if Pc has better graphics than killzone.

Shadow Fall is 95% as impressive as Crysis 3. Plus it has the artistic feel Crysis lacks hard. That's what I say. 

I do not see where my point did fall over, sorry. 

Of course it's linked. If people have not seen any games that is better looking than Shadow Fall on PC, it means that Shadow Fall deserve a great congrats for being a launch up titles on a 400$ hardware. That's all, I know that must hurt to admit it for some of you, but it's the case. 

On Internet, the overall reaction of tendancious people (we all know how everyone on the net is modest and honest...) to the game is "Meh", "Can be better", "Pc games are better looking", "The wii U can do better, even the 3DS can", and other shit things like this. 

Nope, look at Shadow Fall in action and let's all shadow our pride and admit it : Even compared to high ends pc game, Shadow Fall is up to the comparison and that the game is impressive ( best line up title ever ? Imo yes)

Because factually you are wrong in the indicated point.

Also because your OP is all about personnal impressions when reality, whether it is development costs, manufacture costs, moore'slaw, etc. contradicts it from all points of view.

When the 360 and the PS3 came out they would almost cost twice the console of this next gen, the development costs were multiplied by 4, and you had to have a high end PC to surpass the output.

This new gen, a mid-range PC easily beats both X1 and PS4 systems. It's as simple as that.

So this has been proven wrong already:

"I will say it this way : I have never seen something that great in my whole gaming life. Nothing is close to it, NOTHING. You have to see it in action, because even youtube videos (and graphics are already great on them) can't come close to it. Everything is beautiful, really. There's no aliasing, despite the huge number of polygons and high level of texture. There is no clipping anymore despite the vast level. The lightning effects are AMAZING. Everything looks smooth and beautiful... And finally, for the first time since PS3 launch I can say that the face look like something."

Nope.

If you would have had a Laptop with a 780m then yes but this is not equal to the PS4.

To specify I refer to the GPU.

OK.

Killzone looks absolutely stunning. I like that now if I zoom in on a rock the texture doesn't become one giant blur. Everything looks very crisp and not only that, but they were able to make everything look so much more detailed AND completely open things up.

Chapter 2 is incredible when you take into account just how wide open it is.