Sleepyprince said:
fighter said:
Sleepyprince said:
Mr Puggsly said:
Sleepyprince said:
Ah and a correction I feel necessary : The guy on first page talking about his laptop running games like Shadowfall was factually lying. |
There are laptops that can run games like Battlefield 4 and Crysis 3 at highest settings and 1080p.
Those games look at par if not better than Killzone Shadowfall.
|
You know a lot of laptop can runs those two games ? Even some of the actual cheapest one. But would they run those games fine ? Nope, even an high end laptop pc would take 10 to 15 minutes before overheating like it's KFC sales in Chicago Streeterville. Unless you play with your windows open while it's 7° outside.
That said, come on mate, Battlefield 4 and Crysis 3 are the only PC typed games you can come with ? They looks nothing like Shadow Fall. Shadow fall is beautiful technical wise but also artistic wise. Crysis 3 and BF4 are bland and fad, it's way more easy to make them looks technical impressive than Shadow Fall.
|
you lost credibility in the OP but this... this is like launching a missile on your own foot and posting pics
just in case you were not flame baiting, realistic graphics are far harder to achieve than your "artistic" SF style
|
Shadow Fall is 95% as impressive as Crysis 3. Plus it has the artistic feel Crysis lacks hard. That's what I say.
I do not see where my point did fall over, sorry.
|
Because factually you are wrong in the indicated point.
Also because your OP is all about personnal impressions when reality, whether it is development costs, manufacture costs, moore'slaw, etc. contradicts it from all points of view.
When the 360 and the PS3 came out they would almost cost twice the console of this next gen, the development costs were multiplied by 4, and you had to have a high end PC to surpass the output.
This new gen, a mid-range PC easily beats both X1 and PS4 systems. It's as simple as that.
