Play4Fun on 14 November 2013
| fps_d0minat0r said: its hard to compare sony and nintendo because the reviews do not use the same criteria. if a sony game doesnt have an epic story line it gets put down. on most nintendo reviews, the story is barely mentioned. If sony developers carry too many features over from the previous game, it gets called 'nothing new', but copy and paste and repetitiveness in nintendo games is ok. despite how awesome ps games look, if they mess up 1 texture or animation, it gets marks deducted, yet when it comes to nintendo, most graphical related criteria are thrown out the window and simplified 'it looks pretty' even for replay value and multiplayer, much more is expected from PS games than nintendo. the more features a game has, the more its going to get penalised for, and ps games have more features and depth than nintendo games do. everyone might as well makes games like angry birds....really hard to go wrong on anything. 10/10 thanks! I would take a game rated 7 on ps3/4 over a game rated 10 on wii/u |
What an extremely biased and false view on the issue.
But I don't think anyone is surprised it appears like that in your mind.
