soclone said:
|
Maybe the less you make flamebait threads, the less people will be tempted to conduct themselves in a banable manner. Nah, makes too much sense.
soclone said:
|
Maybe the less you make flamebait threads, the less people will be tempted to conduct themselves in a banable manner. Nah, makes too much sense.




Darth Tigris said:
Possibly. But when an obvious trolling flamebait thread by a repeat offender or an attack on a fanbase right in this thread gets no moderations, can you see how that would add an accelerant to the bias fire? Sorry to go off topic, but considering how all of this (resolution AND framerate trolling) is one of the most embarassing l.c.d. fascinations of the online gaming community and media in recent memory, there's not much constructive I can add other than "so what" ... |
posts that are deemed just barely not moderation worthy are not really something that proves bias. Jaywood's thread about Sony targetting arrogant fans is pretty damn flamebaity too and could have been put better but we decide that it's not quite to the point of moderation and take note of it for later. Just because something isn't moderated doe not mean it is ignored. If you find evidence of actual legitimate bias I would be interested to see it and look into it, but if all you're doing is saying "well ____ fanbase gets banned more than ___" based off no evidence then I don't really see a point to answer your post with any other way than mockingly. I'll look at the posts you mentioned. Thread seems like it's caught too late (I actually saw that thread title but never clicked on it since it's not someting I cared about and didn't seem like an obvious issue from the title), but I'll think about the post. It's a minor fanbase attack which happens quite a bit here but it's definitely something I'd like to curb if possible.
Btw, he said "never see Sony fans get banned" so I can say unequivicably that he has selective sight. Or he's been on this site for about 10 minutes and based his conclusion on that. Either way, it's a post I cannot possibly take seriously.
...
| Lafiel said: This game might just be too next gen.. |
I should report you for making sense that is not allowed on here
Forza Motorsport 5 is reported to be running 1080p 60fps. That game looks better and has way more physics going on under the hood than a Call of Duty game. If that game is in 1080p that tells me that the Xbox One is capable of way more than whats happening with Call of Duty and Battlefield.
Personally I don't play FPS so I could care less. I play lots of Forza though and if that's in 1080p that tells me that the system is going to be a really good system. Am I buying it over PS4? I have no idea, I still need to see a lot more. I love PS4 too and I love PS1 as well, it broke my heart to buy it over a Sega Saturn but the Saturn was dying, and I had played most of the games on my buddies Saturn already, I just couldn't in my right mind do it. I had to get a PS1 at that time. Although I did buy my DC not too long after.
I think the way its looking is like some games are gonna look better on each system, just like the last two generations.
Example Phantasy Star Online apparently looked better on Gamecube than XBOX. But NHL games on XBOX were the most complete package with custom soundtracks and a much smoother gameplay, as well Gamecube didn't have NHL games the entire time it was released so you needed another system like PS2 just to play it but the PS2 always looked noticeably dated after a couple year of Xbox and Gamecube and their higher res progressive scan 480p.
Even some games looked better on Dreamcast than PS2 and some games looked better on 360 than PS3 and vice versa.
Torillian said:
posts that are deemed just barely not moderation worthy are not really something that proves bias. Jaywood's thread about Sony targetting arrogant fans is pretty damn flamebaity too and could have been put better but we decide that it's not quite to the point of moderation and take note of it for later. Just because something isn't moderated doe not mean it is ignored. If you find evidence of actual legitimate bias I would be interested to see it and look into it, but if all you're doing is saying "well ____ fanbase gets banned more than ___" based off no evidence then I don't really see a pint to answer your post with any other way than mockingly. I'll look at the posts you mentioned. Thread seems like it's caught too late (I actually saw that thread title but never clicked on it since it's not someting I cared about and didn't seem like an obvious issue from the title), but I'll think about the post. It's a minor fanbase attack which happens quite a bit here but it's definitely something I'd like to curb if possible. Btw, he said "never see Sony fans get banned" so I can say unequivicably that he has selective sight. Or he's been on this site for about 10 minutes and based his conclusion on that. Either way, it's a post I cannot possibly take seriously. |
Thanks for the insight into the process. I'm not calling for people to get banned unless they are repeat offenders. Warnings should work for people that aren't here specifically to cause trouble.
For the record, I wasn't in agreement with the accusation. I was just saying that I personally have seen or even reported what have seemed to be obvious violations of the site's rules that have gone unmoderated while others that didn't seem so bad have been moderated. Heck, I even got a warning one time for something relatively minor and was really surprised but I just accepted it and moved on. There are some that are just problems though and I know you guys can't be everywhere all of the time, so I'll just keep reporting like you guys requested. Thanks again.

Moving back to the topic.
http://www.dualshockers.com/2013/11/05/check-out-how-call-of-duty-ghosts-looks-on-xbox-one-in-two-gameplay-videos/
Would seem as though the Xbox one version suffers just as much (if not more) with frame rate issues after comparing videos for the ps4 and Xbox one versions, I will reserve final judgement till actual reviews but its not looking good.
BrainCramps said:
Irony is, he was wrong...........same people are posting, what is sad is when the 720P x1 version also has fram drops, they won;t be seen anywhere lol. |
Wow, I never said otherwise... I agreed even that the X1 could still suffer from it in an earlier post... Hell, one user even suggested I was thinking there was some "conspiracy"... Irony is... You obviously didn't read my post if I was "wrong"
Jesus christ... This community is going to hell.
Even super high end rigs are having problems with the game.
http://segmentnext.com/2013/11/05/call-of-duty-ghosts-fov-ram-fix-lag-crashes-freezes-stuttering-errors-and-fixes/
So yeah... if you are expecting no framerate drops on xbox one version, get ready..
ironmanDX said:
Jesus christ... This community is going to hell. |
http://www.cinemablend.com/games/Xbox-One-Suffers-Frame-Stutter-Call-Duty-Ghosts-60354.html