By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Ubisoft Snuff Rumors Of Discontinuing Nintendo Support

DevilRising said:
Podings said:
Who even cares.

If you want to make games for Wii U, make something you imagine will be fun to play on it.

Don't port AAA titles just to be disappointed that nobody wants to buy shoddy, late ports of games that weren't meant for the platform in the first place.


How does that even remotely apply to Rayman Legends, or ACIV, or Watch Dogs? None of these have any indication of being "shoddy ports", and none of them are "late" either. In fact, Rayman Legends is the best version of the game (being the original version of the game), and ACIV seems to be a better port of the game than the PS3 or 360 versions. The same will likely be true of Watch Dogs as well. So what is your point?

I don't disagree with the "make something fun to play" sentiment, but the rest just doesn't hold true.


You are of course right, and I shouldn't be speaking so generally when we're specifically talking about Ubisoft, who're doing an admittedly pretty bang-up job.



Around the Network
impertinence said:
I just bought an Assassins Creed game (IV) for the Wii U. Never really been that high on the series but got into some extra cash so I decided to support a third party that at least tries somewhat with a purchase. I think the game is ok, better than I expected, but the real upside is that my kids really love it.

Maybe I'll buy another game from them before I get Watch_Dogs to reward them for their efforts.

Try Rayman LEgends next. 

Believe me, your kids gonna LOVE multiplayer sessions with Rayman. The game has one of the best multiplayer modes I´ve seen.



User Requested removal



LurkerJ said:
It can be a not strong strategy but it can't be stupid? I am done.

Try to avoid false dichotomies. A strategy can be reasonable, but imperfect. It could even be neutral, overall. Or it could perhaps have both upsides and downsides.