No good will come from banning it either. Same goes for alcohol. I don't choose to smoke or drink even though I could buy it if I chose to, but banning it will solve nothing. 

+10 I totally agree with you. Ridiculous law! It seems that the govnerment thinks adults from 18+ can't think for themselves anymore?

Agreed. If cigarette smoke ONLY hurt those who actually smoke them, then fuck 'em, let 'em smoke. But the fact is, it hurts innocent bystanders, second hand smoke is deadly and you can get sick and even eventually die just from being AROUND smokers. Not hyperbole, FACTS.

And sorry smokers out there, you have zero right to bitch, whine or complain about anything. There is not and shouldn't be any such thing as "smokers rights". What you do is a sick, disgusting habit, you are pathetic drug-addicted junkies hurting those around you, and in my personal experience, most smokers are selfish, inconsiderate cocks, IE they don't give much if any thought to blowing their smoke into your air-space. And quest frankly, I don't care if you have a PHD and an IQ of 200+, if you smoke, you forfeit any and all claims to intelligence, simply put.

So yes, smoking should be outlawed worldwide. But it won't be any time soon, because there's too much $$$$$$ tied up in it, and not enough people are smart enough to give a shit. And to people on here trying the tired and flat out incorrect "personal freedom" gig, just stop. You should not have the personal freedom to smoke something that it's smoke can kill others who choose NOT to smoke and live cleanly, any more than you should have the personal freedom to run around stabbing people. Both are forms of assault, and you should not have the personal freedom to do something that hurts others. So yes, it should be banned, and no, there literally is zero intelligent, solid arguments in favor of smoking being legal.

I'll just say here that I've lived most of my life with a daily smoker (roughly 20 years or so), and I'm just fine. So are my brothers, fortunately, who have also spent a good part of their lives around him too. Take that as you will.

I won't address the rest of your post, for obvious reasons...

How does it harm people around the smoker. If you are talking about second hand there is not enoug proof that is statistically signifigant in proving that it causes any harm. Theres a reason why the anti smoking lobby has trouble getting smoking banned in most states.

smoking bad. people do what want tho. ban fatty from mcdonalds same thing cant do it.

I agree cigarettes should be banned indoors. But raising the limit to buy or outlawing smoking outdoors is just strange.

But then again I'm more against smoking weed in public. Just being near the stuff clogs up my nose and even though it's illegal, people smoke it everywhere around here. I don't mind if people want to smoke it in their homes or car, but I can't stand when they do it around me.

Also I'm allergic to the stuff they put in e-cigarettes. Whenever someone is smoking one of those around me, I have a hard time breathing.

Eh, while i'm anti-banning shit.  I'm not sure if cigarettes could survive a prohibition.

The only positive benefit Tobacco gives is a respite from the effects of Tobacco withdrawl.

A banning followed by a sceintific explination about how pointless cigarette and cigar smoking is could feasibly kill smoking in 3-4 generations.

Tobacco is the modern version of eating lead.