Killzone for visual style, BF4 for visual tech, and CoD for nothing.

I'm not really impressed by any of them. They of course look great, but each of these games is clearly a cross-generational game. Especially Battlefield 4 doesn't show any new things on a technological level.

Killzone looks best on the lighting engine alone.

Battle field 4 based off the first gameplay trailer, which is the best looking game ever imo.

The point is whether or not you are impressed, you are picking a winner in between the 3, be they are new games or games from 1989.

killzone

Killzone, if we limit the PC games to 1080p and 60fps.

Otherwise you could have some super rig running them in 4K at 144hz and wins hands down!

I'm having a bit of trouble translating your post. Lay down the booze and try again.

Pick which one looks the best to you instead of picking which one impresses you the most since you are not impressed by them at all. And I drink when I want biach!

BF4 on PC... Why would you put BF4 Beta Screenshots and not the ones thats from gameplay videos and what not? Those Screenshots are very miss leading...

i really don't know and want to wait for the final versions but killzone has easily the best art style which is obviously the advantage when you have a fantasy world so even if battlefield will have a more impressive technique with all the stuff which will happen at the same time, i will like killzone the most from how it looks.

don't really believe that cod will have a chance against bf on pc but to be fair, i haven't really seen much about cod ghosts.

and damn i like the quality of the weapon details in killzone.