It wasn´t ! Both were better in different aspects: insane polygon numbers and fillrate, "free" lighting and almost free particle effects on the Cube vs huge memory pool, easily beeing able to pull from the DX effect pool vs having to programm everything yourself.

The highest number on textured Polygons of the 6th Generation was Rouge Squadron 3 on the GameCube, 20 million polygons @ 60fps

No ! XBox game comes close !

looks pretty

@Bold Just so you know xbox shits on the gamecube in terms of outputting polygons, pixels, and textrue according to the specs. 

BTW chronicles of riddick on the xbox along with doom 3 would like a word with that. 

Just doing what I do. ;P

You have no idea what you are talking about !

You're the one here with no ideas, your just simply a proxy who can do nothing but spout technical jargons without any understanding of them. 

Clearly you refuse the fact that Doom 3 is the most technically impressive game of it's generation in terms of console graphics. 

Bwahaha ! " your just simply a proxy who can do nothing but spout technical jargons without any understanding of them. " Says the one who points at a game without even highlighting whats so special about your own example !

Polygons ? (GC) Textures/amount of RAM  ? (XBox) Fillrate ? (GC)

I´m done, believe what you want to believe !

The fact that doom 3 has more geometry and light years better textures than what rogue squadron 3 has achieved ? 

Keep living in that fantasy world where gamecube is stronger than xbox LOL. 

You've got to be kidding me. First of all, Gamecube's GPU didn't even had any "shaders"(by saying that, you must mean pixel/vertex shader units, otherwise your comment wouldn't even make sense), it's an old 2001 fixed-function GPU. 3DS's GPU, on the other hand, does support vertex and pixel shader functionality compilant with OpenGL ES 1.0 standard, even though it does have fixed-function units.

And all that MHz myth talk is getting tiring. I thought we all had understood that MHz meant nothing back there in 2000, when the high-clocked Pentium 4 processors went against lower-clocked Athlon XP processors and the Athlon XP's actually performed better despite a much lower clock speed. More MHz doesn't always equal better performance, processor architecture does. Within a same architecture, clock speed matters, otherwise, it's useless comparing it.

Aside from all the nonsense you said, you are somewhat right about one thing: 3DS is, indeed, weaker than Gamecube. By saying weaker, I mean that 3DS's GPU outputs less polygons and the dual ARM11 processor is worse than Gamecube's Gekko. Now, compare anything else other than CPU and polygon count and the 3DS will be better, by a fair margin, when compared to the Gamecube.

In light of recent events, I'd like to retract my original statement.