.. Or having to engage in disinformation and grasping of straws to speak to the power issue to justify what is a higher price point.  Those in the Microsoft camp now feel a need to grasp at anything out there that would show their system is superior, because Microsoft is charging a premium.  And I am NOT seeing posts on here on how awesome Kinect is for games.  Can someone here point out which Kinect 2.0 based game people are excited about and have as a must have?  I will look to start another thread on this.

For myself, Ryse piqued my interest when it was going to be a Kinect-centric game.  Now that it has gone into the answer to God of War by Microsoft, I am far less interested.

Never been interested in Kinect after seing it the first time and the limitations and after several reports of how dumb is to use it for play I lost all interest... but sure if MS is charging 100 more because of Kinect2 then they should show why its such a game changer and not that secret sauce will solve all their problems.

What it appears to me to be that Kinect is a late adoptor appealing feature that they have NOT managed to get core early adopters interest in at all.  It is a way to watch TV and so on.  Somehow, it is supposed to turn on causals, for whatever reason.

There is no secret sauce.

Well, why microsoft not tell us the secret sauce, this would make good press for them if stronger then ps4..... but if they not, this just mean there is none.

I think its BBQ sauce.

The have revealed a number of important  components to it.  The CPU is significantly larger, as is the number of co processors and the development of DirectX 11.2 over it's competitors, etc., etc.  Most of it is lost as it whooshes over people's heads.

But now it seems like a child arguing that his Dad's car is faster because it has a higher number on the old speedometer.

I totally agree with this.  There is no screte sauce between either system.  What will define either system is how easy it will be for developers to gain peak performance from either system.  Having the higher number does not always tell the tell if you can only reacy 60% of that number.  

What is good about the PS4 is that developers have a much easier opportunity to reach peak performance, at least thats what the general mentality is today.  MS on the other hand has a much more complex setup and thus their drivers and API must take the load from developers to reach peak performance.  A lot can be done on the software side of things to reach peak performance so it will be interesting to see how things change over the years and the difference between both systems.

From Developer comments, thee road is definitely steeper on the MS end then Sony.

I stopped when The omni gamer guys said the PS3 had a superior GPU compared to the 360 to argue their case.

Whenever anyone talk about secret sauce and things that can't be proved but they use to say how much more powerfull it is you don't even need to read it all to now its probably bs and with weak argumentation.