"I’m not saying that the PS4 is losing at the moment, but the Xbox 360 was very strong in North America. That’s why we’re working there with the mindset “we are the challengers.”"
I like his thinking.
"I’m not saying that the PS4 is losing at the moment, but the Xbox 360 was very strong in North America. That’s why we’re working there with the mindset “we are the challengers.”"
I like his thinking.
Cool, I love this Shuhei Yoshida man and also Kaz Hirai, that creepy english mustached guy is also very cool. MS should hire some charismatic people like Sony does.
pr3st00 said:
1,9 milhao (or 1,9 million) and 2,1 milhoes (or 2,1 millions) What I understood from reading the link I provided is that English works differently. |
That chick in your sig is god damn delicious. Got a name mate?
Intel core i7 930 OC @ 4.0 ghz
XFX Double dissipation Radeon HD 7950 356 bit 3gb GDDR5 OC @ 1150 MHz core + 1575 x 4 memory
Triple channel DDR 3 12gb RAM 1600 MHz

areason said:
It is greater than 1, hence plural allowing you to add the s. The only language that i am aware off that considers million starting from 2 million is french. So you think that the ps4 has over 2 million pre orders? |
you can safely add portuguese (from europe) to that.
allblue said:
That chick in your sig is god damn delicious. Got a name mate? |
Jessica Nigri.
kitler53 said:
the part about NA being bigger (and from above we assume a smaller # of pre-orders) is probably leading to the market share comment. if NA is bigger NA should have more pre-orders right? but he clearly stated they are still "wining" which suggests to me the pre-orders are close probably between the ps4/xbone in NA with a smallish margin in ps4's favor but ps4 is winning handedly in europe. considering ps3's performance, this is fantstic news for ps4. an early lead in MS's strongest markets will put sony far ahead WW. |
Yes, sorry, I meant NA for he pre-order ratio comment as well, not just my second part. Stupid website runs so slowly on mobile browsers that sometimes words I type don't make it in to the post... :/
Thread title is a little misleading.... This thread is clearly discussing the difference between million and millions.
pr3st00 said:
1,9 milhao (or 1,9 million) and 2,1 milhoes (or 2,1 millions) What I understood from reading the link I provided is that English works differently. |
However the link you gave does not say differently from what I said. I would say the reason you aren't understanding it is because your native language isn't English. Mine is, and even though I have not heard someone argue this before, I have never seen someone use "hundreds"/"thousands"/"millions" for anything less than two of that unit ever. (stealth edit: actually, the only time I have is when they are exaggerating, like it said inthe link. But usually if they say "there were hundreds," it would usually be significantly less)
I'm 21 years old and I'm a college student now in my 4th year. I think that qualifies as hearing the language enough to know what is and isn't right with something like this. It can be a bit confusing, though. If you don't want to take my word for it, I'll try to find a source that backs my claim. Though having tried already, it is kind of difficult because no one seems to actually be asking the question.
| ironmanDX said: Thread title is a little misleading.... This thread is clearly discussing the difference between million and millions. ![]() |
lolol.