oniyide said:
|
September 20th. Also there is no price cut in the UK! Someone could correct if that's changed.
oniyide said:
|
September 20th. Also there is no price cut in the UK! Someone could correct if that's changed.
| eFKac said: Global up! Rayman Legends bigger flop than Lost Planet 3? Damn son... And PS3 outsold the Wii U version. Great FFXIV PS3 sales. |
its not a flop, Legends>Origins in sales

Somini said:
September 20th. Also there is no price cut in the UK! Someone could correct if that's changed. |
thats not that bad, but UK? thats weird, need all the help it can get.
tbone51 said:
its not a flop, Legends>Origins in sales |
thats not saying anything considering Origins flopped when it first came out
oniyide said:
thats not saying anything considering Origins flopped when it first came out |
Ubisoft was happy with their sales though.

tbone51 said:
|
i bet they was, considering they were selling it for 60 bucks initially...which it had no business being that high in the first place. Soon as price dropped more people bought
Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn did amazing O.o
I guess they counted Ragnarok Odyssey Ace as more of a "Dragon's Dogma: Dark Arisen" and less of a "God Eater Burst" and counted the sales on top of the original version of the game; rather than separately.
Oh well. That'll boost it up the Vita bestsellers list, I suppose.
| oniyide said:
|
Then here's a question: if it outsold its predecessor, if Ubisoft is profiting heavily from its sales at that price, and they are pleased with its sales in general -- in what way is the game considered a flop? Just why? Because it didn't sell GTA numbers?
