By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - IGN: Xbox One exclusive, Ryse, camera is atrocious (MP tested)

Shinobi-san said:
Typical shitty Vgc thread. Right from the start of the thread (OP) to all the fanboyish comments.

OP could have avoided a lot of this if the title of the thread was more accurate from the start. It should have just been IGN: Ryse Multiplayer Impressions. Why on earth "atrocious" was used in the thread title to describe the game as a whole is beyond me. Hell MP wasnt even in the title initially.

And then to make things worse people dont even read the OP and assume that IGN actually made those comments...and 3/10? Where the hell did that come from? That sure as hell was not in the video.

This was a quick discussion between two guys from IGN who just played the MP of Ryse and had some bad things to say about the experience. They were still pretty optimistic about the SP. That was all.

Now every second comment is all about how Crytek is a known shitty developer...last time i checked they have a pretty dam good record of late. Crysis, Crysis 2, Crysis 3 all good games in their own right.

And then the stupid comments from people who just disregard the complaints that are obviously legit. "Why don't they say the same about God Of War!?!?!"

Seriously guys is this the community you want to be involved in? Is this what you want Vgchartz to be like?

Sorry if your feelings where hurt. But overall, i'd say this thread has been very entertaining. I'm sorry if it wasn't for you. You can go join NeoGaf. I hear they're a much better community. I heard it on the radio. True story, brah.



Around the Network
Incubi said:
Shinobi-san said:
Typical shitty Vgc thread. Right from the start of the thread (OP) to all the fanboyish comments.

OP could have avoided a lot of this if the title of the thread was more accurate from the start. It should have just been IGN: Ryse Multiplayer Impressions. Why on earth "atrocious" was used in the thread title to describe the game as a whole is beyond me. Hell MP wasnt even in the title initially.

And then to make things worse people dont even read the OP and assume that IGN actually made those comments...and 3/10? Where the hell did that come from? That sure as hell was not in the video.

This was a quick discussion between two guys from IGN who just played the MP of Ryse and had some bad things to say about the experience. They were still pretty optimistic about the SP. That was all.

Now every second comment is all about how Crytek is a known shitty developer...last time i checked they have a pretty dam good record of late. Crysis, Crysis 2, Crysis 3 all good games in their own right.

And then the stupid comments from people who just disregard the complaints that are obviously legit. "Why don't they say the same about God Of War!?!?!"

Seriously guys is this the community you want to be involved in? Is this what you want Vgchartz to be like?

Sorry if your feelings where hurt. But overall, i'd say this thread has been very entertaining. I'm sorry if it wasn't for you. You can go join NeoGaf. I hear they're a much better community. I heard it on the radio. True story, brah.

My feelings are fine.

Next time you post a thread though just make it accurate. Theres no need to purposefully flamebait in a thread title and make up random shit.

And also our community is great..we just dont need guys like you to bring us down. Youtube is one click away. Go have fun.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Sees title. Reads op. Views content op is based on.

Remembers why Im not like that anymore.

IGN didnt preview or say any of the OP.

IGN also said the single player was really good. And the combat deep. Plenty of time to fix the bug in Online play.



yo_john117 said:
Porcupine_I said:
it is never good for a game if it gets radically changed during development

Halo got radically changed during development (it was going to be an RTS of sorts) and it turned out to be great for it's time.

 

@9087: The game isn't even out yet...


And then it was a Third person shooter...



Shinobi-san said:
Incubi said:
Shinobi-san said:
Typical shitty Vgc thread. Right from the start of the thread (OP) to all the fanboyish comments.

OP could have avoided a lot of this if the title of the thread was more accurate from the start. It should have just been IGN: Ryse Multiplayer Impressions. Why on earth "atrocious" was used in the thread title to describe the game as a whole is beyond me. Hell MP wasnt even in the title initially.

And then to make things worse people dont even read the OP and assume that IGN actually made those comments...and 3/10? Where the hell did that come from? That sure as hell was not in the video.

This was a quick discussion between two guys from IGN who just played the MP of Ryse and had some bad things to say about the experience. They were still pretty optimistic about the SP. That was all.

Now every second comment is all about how Crytek is a known shitty developer...last time i checked they have a pretty dam good record of late. Crysis, Crysis 2, Crysis 3 all good games in their own right.

And then the stupid comments from people who just disregard the complaints that are obviously legit. "Why don't they say the same about God Of War!?!?!"

Seriously guys is this the community you want to be involved in? Is this what you want Vgchartz to be like?

Sorry if your feelings where hurt. But overall, i'd say this thread has been very entertaining. I'm sorry if it wasn't for you. You can go join NeoGaf. I hear they're a much better community. I heard it on the radio. True story, brah.

My feelings are fine.

Next time you post a thread though just make it accurate. Theres no need to purposefully flamebait in a thread title and make up random shit.

And also our community is great..we just dont need guys like you to bring us down. Youtube is one click away. Go have fun.

If anything, I bring it up. You, however, bring it down with your condescending "i'm better than you" attitude. Everything in the OP was perfectly legitimized. Remember how Aliens:CM looked before it turned out that early developer walkthroughs did'nt represent the final product and it ended up with a 3/10? Remember ZombieU? That also recieved a 3/10 by gamespot. Everyone wanted it to be good, but the final game was percieved as a rushjob by influential gaming sites.  



Around the Network
Incubi said:
Shinobi-san said:
Incubi said:

Sorry if your feelings where hurt. But overall, i'd say this thread has been very entertaining. I'm sorry if it wasn't for you. You can go join NeoGaf. I hear they're a much better community. I heard it on the radio. True story, brah.

My feelings are fine.

Next time you post a thread though just make it accurate. Theres no need to purposefully flamebait in a thread title and make up random shit.

And also our community is great..we just dont need guys like you to bring us down. Youtube is one click away. Go have fun.

If anything, I bring it up. You, however, bring it down with your condescending "i'm better than you" attitude. Everything in the OP was perfectly legitimized. Remember how Aliens:CM looked before it turned out that early developer walkthroughs did'nt represent the final product and it ended up with a 3/10? Remember ZombieU? That also recieved a 3/10 by gamespot. Everyone wanted it to be good, but the final game was percieved as a rushjob by influential gaming sites.  

I am better than you. I would never have made the title of the thread so inaccurate and flamebait'y. I would not have added stupid comments about a game that has not even released yet, that it was a 3/10 game with nothing to back it up.

Also, im not being condescending, you are clearly in the wrong here. I am simply pointing it out.

You purposefully made it seem as if IGN called the game atrocious. They didnt. Even your edited title is inaccurate.

I'm not saying this game shouldnt be critisized or that it will turn out to be great....but theres no reason to exagerate the existing flaws of the game and deliberately lie about it just to get people into your thread and/or rile people up.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Nyleveia said:
Same old vgc same old faces defending/attacking the same old consoles


the x box another1 is not an old console.So new it even doesn't exist right now.



Shinobi-san said:
Incubi said:
Shinobi-san said:
Incubi said:

Sorry if your feelings where hurt. But overall, i'd say this thread has been very entertaining. I'm sorry if it wasn't for you. You can go join NeoGaf. I hear they're a much better community. I heard it on the radio. True story, brah.

My feelings are fine.

Next time you post a thread though just make it accurate. Theres no need to purposefully flamebait in a thread title and make up random shit.

And also our community is great..we just dont need guys like you to bring us down. Youtube is one click away. Go have fun.

If anything, I bring it up. You, however, bring it down with your condescending "i'm better than you" attitude. Everything in the OP was perfectly legitimized. Remember how Aliens:CM looked before it turned out that early developer walkthroughs did'nt represent the final product and it ended up with a 3/10? Remember ZombieU? That also recieved a 3/10 by gamespot. Everyone wanted it to be good, but the final game was percieved as a rushjob by influential gaming sites.  

I am better than you. I would never have made the title of the thread so inaccurate and flamebait'y. I would not have added stupid comments about a game that has not even released yet, that it was a 3/10 game with nothing to back it up.

Also, im not being condescending, you are clearly in the wrong here. I am simply pointing it out.

You purposefully made it seem as if IGN called the game atrocious. They didnt. Even your edited title is inaccurate.

I'm not saying this game shouldnt be critisized or that it will turn out to be great....but theres no reason to exagerate the existing flaws of the game and deliberately lie about it just to get people into your thread and/or rile people up.

Well. I'm looking forward to your amazingly interesting threads. I bet they will get lots of attention. 

I am not clearly in the wrong here. IGN said elements of the game where atrocious, and that it looked nothing like the prerelease footage. That it did'nt look next gen at all. This made me add my own toughts on the matter, as I remember something similar happened with ZombieU and Aliens:CM. If IGN had not said that, a similar thread on NeoGaf wouldn't have caused a meltdown, and there wouldn't be a reason to make one here, either. 

But it is what it is and drama exhumed. Like it should.



Incubi said:
Shinobi-san said:
Incubi said:
Shinobi-san said:
Typical shitty Vgc thread. Right from the start of the thread (OP) to all the fanboyish comments.

OP could have avoided a lot of this if the title of the thread was more accurate from the start. It should have just been IGN: Ryse Multiplayer Impressions. Why on earth "atrocious" was used in the thread title to describe the game as a whole is beyond me. Hell MP wasnt even in the title initially.

And then to make things worse people dont even read the OP and assume that IGN actually made those comments...and 3/10? Where the hell did that come from? That sure as hell was not in the video.

This was a quick discussion between two guys from IGN who just played the MP of Ryse and had some bad things to say about the experience. They were still pretty optimistic about the SP. That was all.

Now every second comment is all about how Crytek is a known shitty developer...last time i checked they have a pretty dam good record of late. Crysis, Crysis 2, Crysis 3 all good games in their own right.

And then the stupid comments from people who just disregard the complaints that are obviously legit. "Why don't they say the same about God Of War!?!?!"

Seriously guys is this the community you want to be involved in? Is this what you want Vgchartz to be like?

Sorry if your feelings where hurt. But overall, i'd say this thread has been very entertaining. I'm sorry if it wasn't for you. You can go join NeoGaf. I hear they're a much better community. I heard it on the radio. True story, brah.

My feelings are fine.

Next time you post a thread though just make it accurate. Theres no need to purposefully flamebait in a thread title and make up random shit.

And also our community is great..we just dont need guys like you to bring us down. Youtube is one click away. Go have fun.

If anything, I bring it up. You, however, bring it down with your condescending "i'm better than you" attitude. Everything in the OP was perfectly legitimized. Remember how Aliens:CM looked before it turned out that early developer walkthroughs did'nt represent the final product and it ended up with a 3/10? Remember ZombieU? That also recieved a 3/10 by gamespot. Everyone wanted it to be good, but the final game was percieved as a rushjob by influential gaming sites.  

Easy man. He is right. Your thread title is wrong. And your comments  in the op are not even igns word. The thread is misleading and innacurate. He has a right by the forum rules to call it out. The forum rules are cleaar as to what isnt allowed.



Incubi said:
Shinobi-san said:
Incubi said:

If anything, I bring it up. You, however, bring it down with your condescending "i'm better than you" attitude. Everything in the OP was perfectly legitimized. Remember how Aliens:CM looked before it turned out that early developer walkthroughs did'nt represent the final product and it ended up with a 3/10? Remember ZombieU? That also recieved a 3/10 by gamespot. Everyone wanted it to be good, but the final game was percieved as a rushjob by influential gaming sites.  

I am better than you. I would never have made the title of the thread so inaccurate and flamebait'y. I would not have added stupid comments about a game that has not even released yet, that it was a 3/10 game with nothing to back it up.

Also, im not being condescending, you are clearly in the wrong here. I am simply pointing it out.

You purposefully made it seem as if IGN called the game atrocious. They didnt. Even your edited title is inaccurate.

I'm not saying this game shouldnt be critisized or that it will turn out to be great....but theres no reason to exagerate the existing flaws of the game and deliberately lie about it just to get people into your thread and/or rile people up.

Well. I'm looking forward to your amazingly interesting threads. I bet they will get lots of attention. 

I am not clearly in the wrong here. IGN said elements of the game where atrocious, and that it looked nothing like the prerelease footage. That it did'nt look next gen at all. This made me add my own toughts on the matter, as I remember something similar happened with ZombieU and Aliens:CM. If IGN had not said that, a similar thread on NeoGaf wouldn't have caused a meltdown, and there wouldn't be a reason to make one here, either. 

But it is what it is and drama exhumed. Like it should.

Nah, im not into the whole copy/paste articles from other sites...add one or two opinions and then call it a thread thing. I'll leave that up to the other guys. I'm more into posting, thats how I contribute to the site. Oh wait you said interesting threads? Interesting.

You are clearly in the wrong. IGN said that the camera was atrocious and that elements of the MP was pretty bad. IT DID NOT DESCRIBE THE GAME AS ATROCIOUS. Which is what your intial thread title and OP implied. I also do not see how you come to the conclusion that the game is a 3/10 just because other hyped games turned out badly. Everything about this thread is either inaccurate or flamebait. I mean atleast admit to it...?

And not everybody thinks a thread where multiple people get banned and almost every post is either pointless and baseless bashing or a equally pointless defensive posts, is entertaining, interesting or the way threads should go.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|