Incubi said:
Shinobi-san said:
Incubi said:
Shinobi-san said:
Typical shitty Vgc thread. Right from the start of the thread (OP) to all the fanboyish comments.
OP could have avoided a lot of this if the title of the thread was more accurate from the start. It should have just been IGN: Ryse Multiplayer Impressions. Why on earth "atrocious" was used in the thread title to describe the game as a whole is beyond me. Hell MP wasnt even in the title initially.
And then to make things worse people dont even read the OP and assume that IGN actually made those comments...and 3/10? Where the hell did that come from? That sure as hell was not in the video.
This was a quick discussion between two guys from IGN who just played the MP of Ryse and had some bad things to say about the experience. They were still pretty optimistic about the SP. That was all.
Now every second comment is all about how Crytek is a known shitty developer...last time i checked they have a pretty dam good record of late. Crysis, Crysis 2, Crysis 3 all good games in their own right.
And then the stupid comments from people who just disregard the complaints that are obviously legit. "Why don't they say the same about God Of War!?!?!"
Seriously guys is this the community you want to be involved in? Is this what you want Vgchartz to be like?
|
Sorry if your feelings where hurt. But overall, i'd say this thread has been very entertaining. I'm sorry if it wasn't for you. You can go join NeoGaf. I hear they're a much better community. I heard it on the radio. True story, brah.
|
My feelings are fine.
Next time you post a thread though just make it accurate. Theres no need to purposefully flamebait in a thread title and make up random shit.
And also our community is great..we just dont need guys like you to bring us down. Youtube is one click away. Go have fun.
|
If anything, I bring it up. You, however, bring it down with your condescending "i'm better than you" attitude. Everything in the OP was perfectly legitimized. Remember how Aliens:CM looked before it turned out that early developer walkthroughs did'nt represent the final product and it ended up with a 3/10? Remember ZombieU? That also recieved a 3/10 by gamespot. Everyone wanted it to be good, but the final game was percieved as a rushjob by influential gaming sites.
|
Easy man. He is right. Your thread title is wrong. And your comments in the op are not even igns word. The thread is misleading and innacurate. He has a right by the forum rules to call it out. The forum rules are cleaar as to what isnt allowed.
