By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Incubi said:
Shinobi-san said:
Incubi said:

If anything, I bring it up. You, however, bring it down with your condescending "i'm better than you" attitude. Everything in the OP was perfectly legitimized. Remember how Aliens:CM looked before it turned out that early developer walkthroughs did'nt represent the final product and it ended up with a 3/10? Remember ZombieU? That also recieved a 3/10 by gamespot. Everyone wanted it to be good, but the final game was percieved as a rushjob by influential gaming sites.  

I am better than you. I would never have made the title of the thread so inaccurate and flamebait'y. I would not have added stupid comments about a game that has not even released yet, that it was a 3/10 game with nothing to back it up.

Also, im not being condescending, you are clearly in the wrong here. I am simply pointing it out.

You purposefully made it seem as if IGN called the game atrocious. They didnt. Even your edited title is inaccurate.

I'm not saying this game shouldnt be critisized or that it will turn out to be great....but theres no reason to exagerate the existing flaws of the game and deliberately lie about it just to get people into your thread and/or rile people up.

Well. I'm looking forward to your amazingly interesting threads. I bet they will get lots of attention. 

I am not clearly in the wrong here. IGN said elements of the game where atrocious, and that it looked nothing like the prerelease footage. That it did'nt look next gen at all. This made me add my own toughts on the matter, as I remember something similar happened with ZombieU and Aliens:CM. If IGN had not said that, a similar thread on NeoGaf wouldn't have caused a meltdown, and there wouldn't be a reason to make one here, either. 

But it is what it is and drama exhumed. Like it should.

Nah, im not into the whole copy/paste articles from other sites...add one or two opinions and then call it a thread thing. I'll leave that up to the other guys. I'm more into posting, thats how I contribute to the site. Oh wait you said interesting threads? Interesting.

You are clearly in the wrong. IGN said that the camera was atrocious and that elements of the MP was pretty bad. IT DID NOT DESCRIBE THE GAME AS ATROCIOUS. Which is what your intial thread title and OP implied. I also do not see how you come to the conclusion that the game is a 3/10 just because other hyped games turned out badly. Everything about this thread is either inaccurate or flamebait. I mean atleast admit to it...?

And not everybody thinks a thread where multiple people get banned and almost every post is either pointless and baseless bashing or a equally pointless defensive posts, is entertaining, interesting or the way threads should go.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|