Smileys will help convey that idea next time. :-!

You're entitled to your opinion just as i am entitled to read Digital Foundry's analysis.

Just as in mathematics, the simplest explanation is the best : KI has been downgraded since as they wanted to maintain 60 fps

I also saw him swear that he is a hardware engineer... am i calling him a liar ?

Here is the source

Trolling much there Rid3rz?

I believe this is the DF article in question - quoted from it -

On the one hand, freely playable first-party titles such as Knack and DriveClub suffer from noticeable frame-rate stutters down from 30fps, while on the other, "hands off" demos for the new Infamous and Assassin's Creed games appear to run without a perceptible hitch. This is in stark contrast to the playable software confirmed to be running direct from Xbox One hardware, such as Forza Motorsport 5 and Killer Instinct, which benefit to no end for targeting the 1080p60 gold standard, and largely succeed in doing so.

Source - http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-hands-on-with-playstation-4

For comparison and fairness, here's the Xbox One hands on preview (published earlier)

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-hands-on-with-xbox-one

The basic point he makes is - there's first party stuff running buttery smooth 1080/60 on One (Forza/Ryse), but the First Party stuff he's seen on ps4 (Drive Club/Knack) is stuttering below 1080/30 - at the same point in time (ie he didn't review/preview them months apart - it was a matter of days).

Its things like this that lead people to believe MS have a bit more under the hood... Or the Driveclub & Knack devs are shittier than Turn10 and Crytek ... Take your pick.

But really, obfuscating, pretending not to have any awareness of the article, misdirecting links - well it's poor form guys. And blatantly obvious trolling. Its not like DF is in any way obscure, or hard to find with google...

The internet isn't the place for you if you're this upset. 

There is no hypocrisy, you do understand the difference between fact and speculation right? I mean we have the people in here who are hardware experts telling you that this is bullshit and your rebuttal is "well I don't think so, so you guys could be wrong." This is speaking from a position of ignorance on your behalf and really speaks volumes about your fealty. 

I'm not speaking against a company, I'm sharing my disagreements with a particular marketing strategy of a particular subsection of a particular section of the company. There is a substantive difference...

Some people clearly are incapable of responding to reality, all dem cloudz I guess.

No one posting in here is an Xbox One hardware expert. Much less an expert in PC hardware in general. This rumor to this day still has not been debunked. Some users have pointed out inconsistency in the rumors or some minor flaws, but not debunked it outright.

Here's more fuel to the fire. Major Nelson just posted saying he can't wait for the truth to come out about the PS4s drastically overexaggerated performance advantage.

Also, to this date, all past hardware rumors were debunked by MS themselves via Albert Penello, Major Nelson, or other MS rep. Yet no one from MS has shot down this rumor that there may be more hardware in the Xbox One that they haven't revealed, possibly a dGPU. I've personally contacted Albert Penello about this rumor and he still hasn't replied. When the RAM rumor was around, he shot that down very quickly.

This is, perhaps, the most ridiculous argument I've ever had the misfortunate of reading in my entire life. 

This is akin to saying "You don't know the design of the new Ford engines, so you can't say they aren't made of styrofoam."

It's argumentum ad ignorantium, a fallacy. I'm getting really sick of you people slinging bullshit.

The 12Gb RAM rumour appears in some important websites.....this one look like the only source is the same blog and is build over the same speculations.