No, I'm pretty sure he means 68GB/s. RAM speed is measured in bytes/s, so 100-200MB/s is pretty slow by comparison.

As for the life cycle, if a developer uses NAND in the same way they use RAM then it'll speed through those cycles a lot faster than a normal NAND drive.

Not talking about the CPU upclock. That was fine, but expecting a console to suddenly have a second high spec GPU with no consideration for reality, not to menion the fact that the games they've shown on X1 are inferior on a technical level to modern PC games... it's just bizzare.

Excuse me while I insert my foot into my mouth.

NVDIMM.  Windows also uses NAND memory in a product called Readyboost.  Essentially this caches reads from non-SSD system (OS) drives.

My comment still applies.  There are still faster implementations of NAND memory, other than in SD cards, and NAND memory doesn't need to be faster than the main DRAM memory, it needs to be faster than the HDD.   

Something is wrong with the xbox one from the moment I saw the cooler, could dissipate 200w, but the jaguar is low-power and with esram I do not think its generates 100W, I believed it was an overkill.
But according to the picture that give 200w to the soc, so much energy, maybe because it is a prototype or hiding something. Why need a big power brick/case/vent/cooler if the components are low-power, why have so strict nda with amd if they have nothing to show.
We must wait until the end of the month to see if they hiding something big or it was just smoke.

Damn, what is up with the xbox one? There seems to be new rumors on it's spec every couple of weeks.

In fact both next gen cpus can't run at +2Ghz. The Jaguar CPU was designed to be running at a relative low frequency, because it does have short transistors pipleine  and there s a particular sweet spot in that kind of processor to  get the best efficiency (loading/unloading bits takes a certain length inside)

A Jaguar at 2.5 Ghz for example, would stall and not get any extra performance, it's just not designed for that kind of frequency. 2 Ghz is the max, but the PS4 will more likely run at 1.6 Ghz, and will be just fine with that. Theses consoles are really gpu centric machines. People don't realize how theses cpus are just strict general purpose units to control the gpu. It's very different from last gen in that regard. In some way we could maybe compare them to the PPE of last gen CPU (just that part)

About the whole dgpu with stack things... is there really some people seriously believing in this?!

They don't even realize, dGPU means discrete GPU wich is a plain simple graphic card, the exact contrary of gpu die. 22nm doesn't even exist for gpu process, so on and on, thats a load of nonsense every line.

It sounds like thoses blog talking about the end of the world, or the upcoming revelation to a new era. They usually die past the date. It's funny and the same time scary, how internet can spread ignorance so fast. 

ok.. after some searching, I found where you pulled that number - by reading this misterx guy's blog (partially, the eye and brain strain gets too much after a while).

Firstly, I'd like to notice that this guy is in serious need of help, and I don't say that as a joke or derogatory comment - this guy needs psychological help. Then, reading through his various posts, this is what is in his mind concerning his magical XBox One:

He started off by proclaiming there is a super dgpu inside the apu (taking the leaked "What should be the next XBox document" early this year). Using weird logic and simply incorrect measurements of the die size. At some point, he realised he is wrong so he tried the 3d stacking idea, which didn't really get him anywhere. His current theory is surprising, though: The XBox One presented at the HotChips talk and everywhere else is just a cable box, it is not the "Real XBox One". This real box has apparently been withheld from 80% of all developers, and will be a supercharged apu. Apparently with all his wet dreams incorporated, using occasional vodoo technology he isn't able to unveil to us mere mortals. (There are about 200 logical fallacies and a few Nobel-prize winning discoveries in all his posts which I left out for brevity, but you should get the idea).

This is approximatly his current mindset. I'm sure he will add other features on his blog in the next days until 9/29 when the evil Sony empire will collapse.

47 MB of eSRAM already accounts for more than 2 Billions of transistors, wich you can breakdown as this :

- vanilla 32 MB eSRAM
- GPU eSRAM 5MB (it does have its own like every gpu)             (! shocker PS4 have eSRAM too !)
- Jaguar CPU eSRAM about 5 MB (4MB cache + instructions)
- Redundancy at about 4 MB, to improve yields. It means that if some of the eSRAM cells are defective, the chip can still work
- Dedicated unit also features tiny bit of eSRAM, like for the audio part, kinect, video encode/decode, etc..

then you add the cpu itself, the gpu itself, the dedicated hardware units and their transistors logic, bus,.. to link everything. You get about 5 Billions transistors on a 363 mm2 die.

Nothing is wrong, there s no empty space, everything matches  the known specs.

You forgot to mention the theory that the die is actually much bigger than 370mm ^2, actually upwrds of 500-520mm^2.

I think you're confusing eSRAM/eDRAM and what L1/L2/L3 and in some cases L4 cache is.