By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Splinter Cell Blacklist Performance Comparison – PS3/Xbox360/Wii U

ethomaz on 26 August 2013

ultima said:

How do you know this?

I agree with RazorDragon. Seems like a render resolution difference, albeit not a dramatic one.

The comparison is also kind of unfair to the X360 version. They definitely should've installed the texture pack.

But why is it a big deal that the Wii U version is the best (technically)? It'd be pretty damn sad if it weren't. In fact, it's already very sad that the loading times are so messed up, even relatively speaking.

The first table in the article .



Around the Network
ultima on 26 August 2013
ethomaz said:

ultima said:

How do you know this?

I agree with RazorDragon. Seems like a render resolution difference, albeit not a dramatic one.

The comparison is also kind of unfair to the X360 version. They definitely should've installed the texture pack.

But why is it a big deal that the Wii U version is the best (technically)? It'd be pretty damn sad if it weren't. In fact, it's already very sad that the loading times are so messed up, even relatively speaking.

The first table in the article .

That's output resolution, not render resolution. That's the only explanation for the "up to" part. Also, that table claims that the 360 can do 1080p, whereas your post stated PS360 at 720p.



           

animegaming on 26 August 2013
think-man said:
Good! now that Nintendo got an awesome port which is superior to other consoles I wanna see it SELL!! no excuses this time.

Everyone who owns a WiiU needs to prove that if you are good to the Nintendo fanbase they will be good to you.


but i don't have the money for it and was waiting for it to go sale to pick it up 



curl-6 on 26 August 2013
ultima said:
ethomaz said:
RazorDragon said:
Wii U version looks much cleaner in those screenshots. Maybe PS3/360 versions are running sub-HD and Wii U version is at 720p? Certainly looks like it.

PS360 720p and WiiU 1080p.

How do you know this?

I agree with RazorDragon. Seems like a render resolution difference, albeit not a dramatic one.

The comparison is also kind of unfair to the X360 version. They definitely should've installed the texture pack.

But why is it a big deal that the Wii U version is the best (technically)? It'd be pretty damn sad if it weren't. In fact, it's already very sad that the loading times are so messed up, even relatively speaking.

Because "sad" is the standard for Wii U ports at present, with devs shitting out unoptimized rushjobs that don't take advantage of the system.



ethomaz on 26 August 2013

ultima said:

That's output resolution, not render resolution. That's the only explanation for the "up to" part. Also, that table claims that the 360 can do 1080p, whereas your post stated PS360 at 720p.

You are right... sorry.



Around the Network
ultima on 26 August 2013
curl-6 said:

Because "sad" is the standard for Wii U ports at present, with devs shitting out unoptimized rushjobs that don't take advantage of the system.

Oh man, that's too bad. Haven't been keeping up with WiiU news lately. 



           

ultima on 26 August 2013
ethomaz said:

ultima said:

That's output resolution, not render resolution. That's the only explanation for the "up to" part. Also, that table claims that the 360 can do 1080p, whereas your post stated PS360 at 720p.

You are right... sorry.

No worries. I just couldn't see the Wii U version looking that much better from the screens.



           

ethomaz on 26 August 2013

ultima said:

No worries. I just couldn't see the Wii U version looking that much better from the screens.

Some screens looks better on PS3 and others better on WiiU... the 360 looks worst.

The performance of WiiU is better but there are twice loadtimes.



curl-6 on 26 August 2013
ultima said:
curl-6 said:

Because "sad" is the standard for Wii U ports at present, with devs shitting out unoptimized rushjobs that don't take advantage of the system.

Oh man, that's too bad. Haven't been keeping up with WiiU news lately. 

It's a lot like the early days of the PS3, where the majority of multiplats suffer from lower framerates.

There have been a few good ones; Trine 2 and Need for Speed were better on Wii U, but most of the time, devs just don't invest the time to make the Wii U version good because they dont think they'll make enough money on the port to justify making an effort.



WagnerPaiva on 26 August 2013

In indisight, Nintendo should have made sure everything on its system was better than the 7 years old HD twins, it would spare then a lot of criticism and would not cost that much more.



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.