Zod95 said:
As for the Wii sales, successes and failures rely on expectactions. In a long-term view, Wii can be considered as a long-term failure because of these reasons: - Nintendo home consoles had more or less these market shares: NES - 90% ; SNES - 60% ; N64 - 30% ; GC - 12% ... and now Wii is at 38.7% (and declining). Is this a success regarding Nintendo's history? - Wii's 1st place in HW total sales is at risk. In the next few years PS3 may surpass it. - Wii lost the generation in SW total sales. Here at VG Chartz we can't see digital sales but, considering them too, both PS3 and X360 have already more games sold than the Wii. - Wii's declining since 2010 hasn't stopped and it made a very successful console to become miserable in weekly sales and reputation, leaving a bad heritage for the Wii U, which is now facing very hard conditions because of that.
I understand you can have a different view about Wii and I respect it. But this is mine. |
My mistake on the first part, I thought u were Iimplying Wii was only as powerful as PS1. Maybe ur right if it was a straight downport but if they made a version built from the ground up for Wii then it would be able to surpass San Andreas.
If success is based on expectations then Wii was an enormous success because nobody thought it would come close to reaching 100m when it was first released. The ultimate goal of a product is to make money and Wii made billions, yes it didnt last as long as thr competition but it followed a typical nintendo cycle of 5-6 years. The Wii didnt fail, Nintendo just failed to follow up its success.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.