painmaster212 said: Boutros said: Pokemon died in 2002. Then why does it still sell close to 10 million+ most the time!?! lol On a serious note though i doubt they are done with the Stadium games but they really do need to rethink who they let make the game this time because it seems there has not been a good console Pokemon game since the N64 days! Give Hal back the ropes to make another one Nintendo because these other guys just aren't working out!

But why would they even want to make stadium games anymore? They don't sell, they can't afford to make a game that wont sell given the Wii U's current situation, and the main selling point for the series is now mute.

Einsam_Delphin said: painmaster212 said: Boutros said: Pokemon died in 2002. Then why does it still sell close to 10 million+ most the time!?! lol On a serious note though i doubt they are done with the Stadium games but they really do need to rethink who they let make the game this time because it seems there has not been a good console Pokemon game since the N64 days! Give Hal back the ropes to make another one Nintendo because these other guys just aren't working out! But why would they even want to make stadium games anymore? They don't sell, they can't afford to make a game that wont sell given the Wii U's current situation, and the main selling point for the series is now mute.

Do we know what sales means a game has made profit? A lowkey game like Pokemon Stadium i would say if it sold more then 100k its profited and looking at the last entry i see it sold 1.5 million which means the game was more then enough to gather up quite a bit of profit for Nintendo so why not? Its a lowkey title that has no risk because of the name Pokemon alone will least sell a cool million and if they choose to put more work into it could be even better.

There are a lot of better spin-offs.

Mystery dungeons are my favourites.

All I can say about stadium is that it was neither a public nor critic acclaim

There is absolutely no point in having the stadium games return. Or a Revolution sequel. Pokemon has moved away from 2D Sprites, so there is no need for a version that "looks better and plays differently."

I just really want Pokemon Snap 2 and an RPG on Wii U, it doesnt have to be a mainline RPG, maybe something similar to Mystery Dungeon

painmaster212 said: Einsam_Delphin said: painmaster212 said: Boutros said: Pokemon died in 2002. Then why does it still sell close to 10 million+ most the time!?! lol On a serious note though i doubt they are done with the Stadium games but they really do need to rethink who they let make the game this time because it seems there has not been a good console Pokemon game since the N64 days! Give Hal back the ropes to make another one Nintendo because these other guys just aren't working out! But why would they even want to make stadium games anymore? They don't sell, they can't afford to make a game that wont sell given the Wii U's current situation, and the main selling point for the series is now mute. Do we know what sales means a game has made profit? A lowkey game like Pokemon Stadium i would say if it sold more then 100k its profited and looking at the last entry i see it sold 1.5 million which means the game was more then enough to gather up quite a bit of profit for Nintendo so why not? Its a lowkey title that has no risk because of the name Pokemon alone will least sell a cool million and if they choose to put more work into it could be even better.

We don't (atleast I don't), but development cost have greatly risen since entering the HD era. I wouldn't be surprised if 100k wasn't enough to even make a game break even anymore, though I suppose it still mainly depends on how much effort n production values they put into a game. Regardless, they'd be better making any of their other Pokemon spin-offs instead so they'll get more sales, or perhaps something completely different. Like someone on here said, an open world Pokemon game would be amazing to see!