So troll, why on the Google spreadsheet is there no overall rankings this year? I also I am not able to comment? Why do the Packers suck so much this year? Thanks.

Preseason voting: Who will win the Super Bowl? | |||
| Ravens | 28 | 6.14% | |
| Patriots | 53 | 11.62% | |
| Broncos | 141 | 30.92% | |
| Texans | 9 | 1.97% | |
| Other (AFC) | 19 | 4.17% | |
| 49ers | 32 | 7.02% | |
| Falcons | 5 | 1.10% | |
| Packers | 17 | 3.73% | |
| Seahawks | 101 | 22.15% | |
| Other (NFC) | 47 | 10.31% | |
| Total: | 452 | ||
So troll, why on the Google spreadsheet is there no overall rankings this year? I also I am not able to comment? Why do the Packers suck so much this year? Thanks.

Formal Rol? Okay, thanks.
So anyways, the Broncos scored 49 points with Peyton last game. Then he took almost a full quarter off and let back up Brock Osweiller play the rest of the game. Winning like this fells good I could probably brag all night. The defense will only get better with the return of Von Miller and Champ Bailey.

|
These picks are subject to change through out the week.
| RolStoppable said: ANNOUNCEMENT - The Quarterly Report Since this is the second season in which I run a full-fledged prediction league, I thought it would be a neat idea to do a few year over year comparisons. All the data is obviously taken from my spreadsheets, the 2012 edition can be viewed here for anyone who is interested. 1. Last year we had 25 players, this year we have 24. While that is a decline at a first glance, the truth is that we had a bunch of early quitters last season. After week 4, only 19 people were still eligible to enter the playoffs, this year the number is 23. 2. In 2012 only one player had reached or eclipsed the 40 wins mark, this year we have nine to do the same. Now whether that is because we simply got better at predicting games or because we didn't have to deal with replacement referees through the first three weeks is up for debate. My belief is that it's the former. 3. Out of the 17 returning players, 15 are flat or up year over year. Only Kenology and ljigga are doing worse. In Kenology's defense, he was the clear leader at this point of the season in 2012, so he faced the toughest comparison. As for ljigga, it must have been a fluke that he won the mini-prediction league in 2011. His 2012 performance wasn't hard to match, but he still managed to fall short by one game in 2013. 4. In 2012 Kenology claimed the top spot in week 2 and remained there for six weeks straight. This year we had a new leader in every single week, but as already mentioned in the previous post with this year's week 4 results, noname2200 sat at the top at two different times. 5. In 2012 only 15 out of 25 players had managed to earn at least one prediction point through week 4. This time around it's 19 out of 24. However, this statistic is a bit misleading, because in 2013 there were two new ways to earn PP integrated: For one, the top 5 worthy record for people tied in #6, and two, the perfect result for MNF. I hope you enjoyed reading this little feature and I plan to do another one like this after week 9. |
That hurts man, that hurts.... I'm going to finish strong now, just you see!
I'm counting on Rol to keep me high in the standings. Speaking of, go Falcons!
Einsam_Delphin said:
Alright you're on! |
sons of bitches....
Einsam_Delphin said:
Sorry Chuck! Maybe just put Rol on your ignore list for a week lol. And since this game is over, I guess I'll go back to MK7! |
I'm used to Rol's shenanigans.
I would just like to say that I was the only one that saw Cleveland's resurgence last week. That prediction had to be over 9000
The definitive evidence that video games turn people into mass murderers
|
Reasons
DET/GB: Flipped a coin.
SEA/IND: Seahawks are the strongest team in the NFC so hard to go against them.
BUF/CLE: Cleavland is just not able to hold a 3 game win streak.
NE/CIN: Pretty obvious reasons, mostly Dalton.
BAL/MIA: Even though they lost to the Saints they are still stronger then this current Ravens.
NO/CHI: They are the saints thats all thats needed to be said.
PHI/NYG: Both shitty but Philly is slightly less shit filled then New York.
KC/TEN: Bet on Chiefs except when against the Broncos.
JAC/STL: My Jags are bound to win one game this season either playing a almost equel shitty team (like this case) or a random fluke so I'll put my one Jag bet down now.
CAR/ARI: Just no good reason to choose Arizona.
DEN/DAL: Dallas is at .500 but they are playing the Broncos so the thinking was done for me.
SD/OAK: A okay team playing a shit team easy choice.
HOU/SF: Though SF has been unstable I trust them more then the Texans right now with how they are playing.
NYJ/ATL: Even though they aren't the Falcons of 2012 they are still better then the Jets under Ryan.
Former something....