OP - There's so much reaching/stretching in this "analysis" it's not funny. I don't know where to begin.
* "Publishers and not devs receive the income from game sales" - and they pay the devs. If no one shops at Walmart - all those employees are out of a job. If sales are booming - they hire more staff. If they take a chance on a risky/edgy/niche product line, and it sells well - they get more. This isn't rocket science.
* "MS helped inititate PRISM" - FFS? What? They pushed GW Bush to bring in the Patriot Act (what 10 years ago) , to effectively legalise spying on US soil - and also implemented the "if you don't co operate with the government's requests - through non compliance you'll find yourself guilty of treason" - and came up with the whole PRISM thing, requesting data from multiple US companies - most of which have no connection to MS at all? They must have bought Skype purely as a favour to the NSA. Are you serious? Maybe a little young?
That's enough for now - this is a ridiculous reach of an OP, with very little - to no - bearing in reality at all. This whole argument you're having with an empty chair (such choice quotes as "wrong again DUMMY!:) - is delusional to the point of comedy. Clint Eastwood himself would probably be laughing - "at least I'm not as far gone as that guy!".