By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - The argument that Nintendo will have a monopoly if the Vita were to die doesn't make sense.

Nintendo actually had a larger monopoly in the 1990's, and had much more competition at least terms of number of competing systems(Sega Game Gear, Atari Lynx, Sega Nomad, Neo Geo Pocket, etc.). PSP has been the only system ever to seriously challenge Nintendo's handheld crown. The only difference is now the number of competitors is small and the the sales are higher for them.



 

Around the Network

so-you try to say that nintendo won't have a handheld monopol when vita dies and nintendo have a monopol.?

you are a genius -guy.

And ios/android games(either 99% shit or suffering from shitty controls )to be euqivalent competitors?lol-that's like pretending that the usual tv shit shows and series that are shown all the day long are a fair competition to hollywood 200 mio blockbuster movies.

please stop making stupid threads.



spurgeonryan said:
BasilZero said:

If Vita dies, games that would of came out on it wouldnt come out on anything at all lol.


You do not think that they would come out on a smart phone/pad or the 3DS?

 

I have never heard anyone say this. Nintendo may own the Handheld market if this happened, But there are plenty of other options for people these days.

Maybe they will go to 3ds but not to smartphones.



PS4 - over 100 millions let's say 120m
Xbox One - 70m
Wii U - 25m

Vita - 15m if it will not get Final Fantasy Kingdoms Heart and Monster Hunter 20m otherwise
3DS - 80m

sethnintendo said:

Vita isn't going to die. It just isn't going to reach PSP levels of sales. Can the Vita run emulators like the PSP? That was a decent selling point for the PSP.

Nintendo owns hand helds. Many have tried and many have failed to compete with Nintendo in hand helds. I'd say Sony put up the best competition with the PSP and it sold really well with Europe sales still continuing decently. Game Gear was the next closest competition Nintendo had during hand helds and they put Sega to shame in sales. I had a Game Gear (it rocked while keeping it plugged in or using rechargeable batteries) but it could never reach Nintendo sales for hand helds. 

Anyways, Sony isn't selling the system for a loss to my knowledge and they are definetely making money off of memory cards.  So if they are making money but only selling 20-50k a week for most of the year..  Who cares?  If they are making money they will continue to sell it till the markets completely sinks/retailers pull back all or almost all shelf space).  At least they are making money off it and not losing millions/billions like their TV business has been doing for nearly a decade.

they need much more money than they're getting now in order to pat R&D costs for vita.



Gamers don't like admitting it, but Android and Iphone are competition, albiet not officially since it isn't "the big 3".



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Around the Network

I really don't think android/ios as competition for handhelds. its almost in a completely different market. I tried gaming strictly on my ipod for a month, but it just suuuuuucks for gaming. most of the games are crap, and even the best ones pales in comparison to games like Kid Icarus Uprising, AC New Leaf, Mario Kart 7, RE revelations, Luigi's Mansion etc. etc.

the only thing they have over handhelds is that they are dirt cheap, but im willing to shell out $30+ a game if that means Im getting good quality. me, and my other fellow gamers still play games on our Ipods/Iphones but mostly because we don't really have anything better to do, like if we are just waiting for something and its the best way to pass time.

the only market it exclusively has is the casual gamer market, and current 3DS sales show that they are doing pretty darn fine without them.