happy is still at it I see. Dissapointing.
| happydolphin said: What if I told you that some of the mods were heavily Sony-biased?
|

Oh, woopdie doo, the Sony parade has come marching in.
| pezus said:
The question was simple, and it was simple too in the U thread. It wasn't a thread calling it a failure, it was asking if the concept or execution failed. The simple fact of the matter is that PS4 has.not.launched. and therefore the thread question wasn't a real question which led to your thread being locked. You may call that Sony bias, but in reality it's just one thread making sense and the copy not. |
No, it wasn't, it was frontloaded. He didn't ask if the U concept or execution failed, he asked if the U was a failure IN concept or execution, then went on to ask if it was either or both, basically suggesting that the U was an all-around failure simply because if you either-or concept and execution, you can't limit failure to launch execution since concept is all-around failure.
It was at best a poorly posed question.
The PS4 had not launched you are italicising and dotting something that was the.exact.irony.of.the.PS4.thread means that you still don't get it. The thread posed a real question, which was in essence, "Does it make sense to call the U a failure", like I said in my past post.
The truth is the thead had a point and it is my high speculation that the sony fanbase came in to report it without even understanding why it was posted, and the sony-biased mod locking it without confering with his colleagues.
happydolphin said:
No, it wasn't, it was frontloaded. He didn't ask if the U concept or execution failed, he asked if the U was a failure IN concept or execution, then went on to ask if it was either or both, basically suggesting that the U was an all-around failure simply because if you either-or concept and execution, you can't limit failure to launch execution since concept is all-around failure. It was at best a poorly posed question. The PS4 had not launched you are italicising and dotting something that was the.exact.irony.of.the.PS4.thread means that you still don't get it. The thread posed a real question, which was in essence, "Does it make sense to call the U a failure", like I said in my past post. The truth is the thead had a point and it is my high speculation that the sony fanbase came in to report it without even understanding why it was posted, and the sony-biased mod locking it without confering with his colleagues. |
oh the thread has a point, just not a good one. You have any proof that some SOny fan asked to lock it or are you just making baseless accusations
| oniyide said:
oh the thread has a point, just not a good one. You have any proof that some SOny fan asked to lock it or are you just making baseless accusations |
You can call it baseless accusations, I call it an educated guess. Either way they were hastily locked.
happydolphin said:
You can call it baseless accusations, I call it an educated guess. Either way they were hastily locked. |
nothing educated about it, just ask the mod who locked it who dropped the dime, hell maybe nobody did and the mod saw the thread for what it was and did his job.
| happydolphin said: Oh, woopdie doo, the Sony parade has come marching in. |
Oh, woopdie doo, it's your time of the month again.
Oh wait, it's always your time of the month.
riderz13371 said:
Oh, woopdie doo, it's your time of the month again. Oh wait, it's always your time of the month. |
Do you want to get banned?
happydolphin said:
Do you want to get banned? |

If I'm gonna go out, I'm going to go out with a bang.
This post (as well as the quoted post) has been moderated by axumblade