By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - WiiU is a generation ahead the Wii.

 

Is the WiiU a generation ahead from the Wii

Yes, cause HD, RAM, GPU, online... 254 69.97%
 
No, cause I hate Nintendo. 30 8.26%
 
Chinese food is way bette... 79 21.76%
 
Total:363

I don't know, The Wii U feels like a huge step backwards from the Wii.

Hell, Wii U probably should have been released in 2006. And Wii in 2012.



Bet between Slimbeast and Arius Dion about Wii sales 2009:


If the Wii sells less than 20 million in 2009 (as defined by VGC sales between week ending 3d Jan 2009 to week ending 4th Jan 2010) Slimebeast wins and get to control Arius Dion's sig for 1 month.

If the Wii sells more than 20 million in 2009 (as defined above) Arius Dion wins and gets to control Slimebeast's sig for 1 month.

Around the Network
Arius Dion said:
I don't know, The Wii U feels like a huge step backwards from the Wii.

Hell, Wii U probably should have been released in 2006. And Wii in 2012.


what you saying? GameCube still ahead of PS4, nonsense!



and one thing? Chinese food is NOT better than Japanese food, please die

Moderated,

-Mr Khan



Soleron said:
Aquietguy said:
LOL! Next there will be Nintendo haters saying the U is on par with the wii and Nintendo was stupid for creating a new console instead of having the pad communicate with the Wii.

They were stupid for releasing the pad at all. Keeping on with the Wii would have been best.

- 20x the installed base
- Virtual Console already had all the games on it
- Bug-free, fast OS
- Not like they could have less third party support
- Gamecube BC
- Every first party game shown so far except Pikmin 3 and X would have worked on it as is, graphics wise
- 1/2 the price
- No one is buying Wii U for the U Pad's gameplay anyway

I was just joking but the pad is one of the best moves Nintendo has made. There's three reasons why it's not selling.

 

1) The heavy hitters haven't been released and the lack of games.

2) The poor advertising to the casuals.

3) the anti Nintendo bias from haters.

Do you really beleave that they should have stayed with the Wii? The hater would really be going to town. But you know as well as I that the real reason for all the hate on the pad is because Nintendo created it. Had Sony did those same hates would be praising it like there is no tommoro.



All that next-generation talk makes little sense. First, you need to know one thing to start these kinds of discussions: what defines a new generation? Obviously, it's when a new videogame releases after a long time without "new" videogames, and when that new videogame improves the general graphical power when compared to old consoles. It has been like this since the NES was considered to be in a new generation, because, well, it was more powerful than a Atari 2600 and had been released a lot of time after 2600's release, and it actually never changed, no matter how anyone tries to spin that. Wii U was next-generation when it wasn't released yet simply because it is more powerful than the last gen consoles(PS3/360/Wii) and has been released a lot of time after the release of those consoles. It's current gen now, because it has already released and started a new generation based on new graphics and release dates. The power difference itself doesn't matter, what matters is that it exists, even if it is small or big, and that difference in power needs to exist with a difference in release dates to define a new generation.



Around the Network
Aquietguy said:

...

I was just joking but the pad is one of the best moves Nintendo has made. There's three reasons why it's not selling.

 

1) The heavy hitters haven't been released and the lack of games.

2) The poor advertising to the casuals.

3) the anti Nintendo bias from haters.

Do you really beleave that they should have stayed with the Wii? The hater would really be going to town. But you know as well as I that the real reason for all the hate on the pad is because Nintendo created it. Had Sony did those same hates would be praising it like there is no tommoro.

The pad is just stupid. Explain to me the uses of it in game such that people who weren't going to buy the console will buy it.

It increased the console price by $100! Are you really saying people would have paid $100 for a Pad if it was standalone? If not, it's not worth it.

The "heavy hitters" will make it sell like a Gamecube. Even with Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Smash, Kart, I think you'd consider 20m a huge disappointment.

The lack of games is the biggest factor.. but there are actually a lot of games on the system. Just not ones people want to buy. And a large part of that is the Pad being shoehorned everywhere.

Bias from haters doesn't affect console sales at all, stop thinking like that.

The real reason for the hate on the pad is because it's a terrible idea! If Sony made it, they really wouldn't make it compulsory, and then it would die as many hardware accessories have.



Soleron said:
Aquietguy said:

...

I was just joking but the pad is one of the best moves Nintendo has made. There's three reasons why it's not selling.

 

1) The heavy hitters haven't been released and the lack of games.

2) The poor advertising to the casuals.

3) the anti Nintendo bias from haters.

Do you really beleave that they should have stayed with the Wii? The hater would really be going to town. But you know as well as I that the real reason for all the hate on the pad is because Nintendo created it. Had Sony did those same hates would be praising it like there is no tommoro.

The pad is just stupid. Explain to me the uses of it in game such that people who weren't going to buy the console will buy it.

It increased the console price by $100! Are you really saying people would have paid $100 for a Pad if it was standalone? If not, it's not worth it.

The "heavy hitters" will make it sell like a Gamecube. Even with Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Smash, Kart, I think you'd consider 20m a huge disappointment.

The lack of games is the biggest factor.. but there are actually a lot of games on the system. Just not ones people want to buy. And a large part of that is the Pad being shoehorned everywhere.

Bias from haters doesn't affect console sales at all, stop thinking like that.

The real reason for the hate on the pad is because it's a terrible idea! If Sony made it, they really wouldn't make it compulsory, and then it would die as many hardware accessories have.

100% Agree. As a Wii owner I see Wii U as a huge 'wtf'?

My question is, if I don't like the Wii U Gamepad and don't see it as necessary, does that basically mean Wii U isn't for me? If so, the Gamepad is no different than M$ with Kinect.



Bet between Slimbeast and Arius Dion about Wii sales 2009:


If the Wii sells less than 20 million in 2009 (as defined by VGC sales between week ending 3d Jan 2009 to week ending 4th Jan 2010) Slimebeast wins and get to control Arius Dion's sig for 1 month.

If the Wii sells more than 20 million in 2009 (as defined above) Arius Dion wins and gets to control Slimebeast's sig for 1 month.

Arius Dion said:
Soleron said:

100% Agree. As a Wii owner I see Wii U as a huge 'wtf'?

My question is, if I don't like the Wii U Gamepad and don't see it as necessary, does that basically mean Wii U isn't for me? If so, the Gamepad is no different than M$ with Kinect.


100% Agree. As a Gamecube owner I see the Wii as a huge 'wtf'?

My question is, if I don't like the Wii remote and don't see it as necessary, does that basically mean Wii isn't for me? If so, the Wii remote is no different than M$ with Kinect.

 

On a more serious note: Yes, the Wii remote is less expensive but the differences ends there for me. If I could navigate through the Wii menus using a Gamecube controller or Classic controller I would have been perfectly fine without even owning a Wii remote. Not to mention that Twilight princess, Super Smash Bros. Brawl and Mario Kart Wii was perfectly playable with a GC controller one way or another. SM Galaxy would have been just as great, too. If not better using the C-stick to control the camera.

 

So yeah, requirements that appears unnecessary to some is nothing new.



Brutalyst said:
Yeah, the WiiU is a generation ahead of the Wii, but the Wii was a generation behind everything else out at the same time

do you know what generation means? its chronology not power, 



IIIIITHE1IIIII said:
Arius Dion said:
Soleron said:

100% Agree. As a Wii owner I see Wii U as a huge 'wtf'?

My question is, if I don't like the Wii U Gamepad and don't see it as necessary, does that basically mean Wii U isn't for me? If so, the Gamepad is no different than M$ with Kinect.


100% Agree. As a Gamecube owner I see the Wii as a huge 'wtf'?

My question is, if I don't like the Wii remote and don't see it as necessary, does that basically mean Wii isn't for me? If so, the Wii remote is no different than M$ with Kinect.

 

On a more serious note: Yes, the Wii remote is less expensive but the differences ends there for me. If I could navigate through the Wii menus using a Gamecube controller or Classic controller I would have been perfectly fine without even owning a Wii remote. Not to mention that Twilight princess, Super Smash Bros. Brawl and Mario Kart Wii was perfectly playable with a GC controller one way or another. SM Galaxy would have been just as great, too. If not better using the C-stick to control the camera.

 

So yeah, requirements that appears unnecessary to some is nothing new.

LoL. Cute. 

Then perhaps I was right in that Wii U has more in common with Gamecube than it does Wii...The gamecUbe



Bet between Slimbeast and Arius Dion about Wii sales 2009:


If the Wii sells less than 20 million in 2009 (as defined by VGC sales between week ending 3d Jan 2009 to week ending 4th Jan 2010) Slimebeast wins and get to control Arius Dion's sig for 1 month.

If the Wii sells more than 20 million in 2009 (as defined above) Arius Dion wins and gets to control Slimebeast's sig for 1 month.