By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - WiiU is a generation ahead the Wii.

 

Is the WiiU a generation ahead from the Wii

Yes, cause HD, RAM, GPU, online... 254 69.97%
 
No, cause I hate Nintendo. 30 8.26%
 
Chinese food is way bette... 79 21.76%
 
Total:363
anthony64641 said:
well the ps2 was consider a generation behide.. look how that turned out

It really wasn't. It was considered weaker than Xbox and Gamecube, but thats because it came out first. It wasn't a generation behind though and it has the best library of games ever.



Around the Network
Metallicube said:
Brutalyst said:
Yeah, the WiiU is a generation ahead of the Wii, but the Wii was a generation behind everything else out at the same time


Yet another "hardcore" gamer who only views progress in terms of polygon counts..

It's quite the opposite of what you claim actually.. Wii was WAY ahead of its time, which is the reason Sony and MS are now trying to "catch up" with their motion control Wii-type games. PS3 and 360 were and are the ones behind the times, clinging to the same old type of games and gameplay, and also the reason they are fighting for second place. Wii was truly something new.

Wii wasn't ahead of its time, it was a fad that quickly faded away. It's why the Wii got outsold in the UK and why it will be outsold in the US. It's also why the Wii U is struggling. People just got tired of motion controls once they figured out they are just waggling. Sony tried to create a more realistic motion control experience with PS Move, people didn't care. Wii left a bad taste in peoples mouths. Motion Controls aren't the future, they are the past. Even Microsoft has given up on trying to push Kinect as the future of gaming, its just a Siri-box now.



VGKing said:
Metallicube said:
Brutalyst said:
Yeah, the WiiU is a generation ahead of the Wii, but the Wii was a generation behind everything else out at the same time


Yet another "hardcore" gamer who only views progress in terms of polygon counts..

It's quite the opposite of what you claim actually.. Wii was WAY ahead of its time, which is the reason Sony and MS are now trying to "catch up" with their motion control Wii-type games. PS3 and 360 were and are the ones behind the times, clinging to the same old type of games and gameplay, and also the reason they are fighting for second place. Wii was truly something new.

Wii wasn't ahead of its time, it was a fad that quickly faded away. It's why the Wii got outsold in the UK and why it will be outsold in the US. It's also why the Wii U is struggling. People just got tired of motion controls once they figured out they are just waggling. Sony tried to create a more realistic motion control experience with PS Move, people didn't care. Wii left a bad taste in peoples mouths. Motion Controls aren't the future, they are the past. Even Microsoft has given up on trying to push Kinect as the future of gaming, its just a Siri-box now.


LOL!  Um, I don't know if you're aware of this, but Microsoft is bundling Kinect with all Xbox Ones.  So, it's the exact opposite of what you're saying.  It's also why Xbox One is so expensive compared to PS4.  The cost of Kinect 2.0.

And Wii was very much ahead of it's time.  Advances in technology applies to making development easier rather than more difficult, and engineered to run quieter and consume less power.  The Wii Remote is by far the most popular game controller that's ever existed.  Over 100 million sold, just in the US.  Think about that.  If you take into account Europe and Japan and include that with North America, there are probably more Wii Remotes sold than the entire install bases of Xbox 360 and PS3 combined.



The Screamapillar is easily identified by its constant screaming—it even screams in its sleep. The Screamapillar is the favorite food of everything, is sexually attracted to fire, and needs constant reassurance or it will die.

radha said:
Aquietguy said:
radha said:
SuperMarioWorld said:
Brutalyst said:
Yeah, the WiiU is a generation ahead of the Wii, but the Wii was a generation behind everything else out at the same time


yeah that's why PS3 introduced Move and Xbox introduced Kinect. To compete with a console a generation behind everythig else?!? You're so out of touch dude.


Well the fad has ended. POP!

By fad you must mean move becuase the wii mote is a viable option and kinect is bundled with the X1.

"wii mote" look at current Wii and Wii U sales

"kinect is bundled with the X1" which is a reason to not buy according to many. 

So as you can see the fad has ended, general public is not interested in games because of Wii mote anymore and hardcore gamers dont care or wont buy a console because it has motion control.

Current sells doesn't mean the wii mote is a fad. It never was a fad. It was and is a damn good control scheme. It's superior than dual analogs for FPS's. The only people to call th wii mote a fad were Nintendo haters. Did I mention it's still very much an option for the U.



Observation:

1. The Wii U is indeed next gen compared to the Wii'

2. Nintendo will have the weakest console on the market again

3. Chinese Food is ten times better than Japanese Food

4. For as weak as the Wii U is.. there were times I thought it kicked the crap out of anything XBONE and PS4 showed us..

5. The Wii U has the power developers need.. it's just an excuse when they talk about how weak it is.. in fact The PS4 and XBONE are actually going to be overpowered if anything..

Anyway... there you go...



Nintendo Wii by generations...

1. Wii

2. Wii U

3. Wii O U

Predictions made by gamers concerning the current Nintendo line up of games.

Pikmen 3= Little Bump to nothing. (Got Little Bump)

Wind Waker HD= Won't sell anything (The explosion happened here and at one time 4 Wii U games was in the Amazon top 100)

Super Mario 3D World= Won't help at all looks cheap. (Currently the most sought after Wii U game and continuing the Wii U increase.)

Around the Network
Gamegears said:
Observation:

5. The Wii U has the power developers need.. it's just an excuse when they talk about how weak it is.. in fact The PS4 and XBONE are actually going to be overpowered if anything..

Anyway... there you go...


Overpowered? Hardly. If anything I consider them both underpowered in comparison to last generation vs a high-end PC.
Remember, the consoles will be stuck with the same hardware for it's entire life, they will feel incredibly antiquated by generations end, compounded by the fact both consoles are using a mix of low-end/mid-range hardware to begin with doesn't help matters.




www.youtube.com/@Pemalite

VGKing said:
Metallicube said:
Brutalyst said:
Yeah, the WiiU is a generation ahead of the Wii, but the Wii was a generation behind everything else out at the same time


Yet another "hardcore" gamer who only views progress in terms of polygon counts..

It's quite the opposite of what you claim actually.. Wii was WAY ahead of its time, which is the reason Sony and MS are now trying to "catch up" with their motion control Wii-type games. PS3 and 360 were and are the ones behind the times, clinging to the same old type of games and gameplay, and also the reason they are fighting for second place. Wii was truly something new.

Wii wasn't ahead of its time, it was a fad that quickly faded away.

No, it wasn't. 5 years is a normal console lifespan, a fad would have been 2 years.



VGKing said:
Yeah, it is ahead of the Wii. OBVIOUSLY.
But the Wii was a generation behind PS3/360 so this basically puts Wii U roughly on par with 7th gen consoles.


Just because the wii was lower powered than the PS360 doesn't mean the U is on par with them. Many developers have praised the U for its power. 



curl-6 said:
VGKing said:
Metallicube said:
Brutalyst said:
Yeah, the WiiU is a generation ahead of the Wii, but the Wii was a generation behind everything else out at the same time


Yet another "hardcore" gamer who only views progress in terms of polygon counts..

It's quite the opposite of what you claim actually.. Wii was WAY ahead of its time, which is the reason Sony and MS are now trying to "catch up" with their motion control Wii-type games. PS3 and 360 were and are the ones behind the times, clinging to the same old type of games and gameplay, and also the reason they are fighting for second place. Wii was truly something new.

Wii wasn't ahead of its time, it was a fad that quickly faded away.

No, it wasn't. 5 years is a normal console lifespan, a fad would have been 2 years.


And need I mention again that the wii mote is still being used for the U?



VGKing said:
anthony64641 said:
well the ps2 was consider a generation behide.. look how that turned out

It really wasn't. It was considered weaker than Xbox and Gamecube, but thats because it came out first. It wasn't a generation behind though and it has the best library of games ever.


SNES says hi