BasilZero said:
The AC series is in my top 5 favorite western franchises list. Ironically its the only Ubisoft series I've ever played (never played Rayman or anything else from Ubisoft) I first got into the series by playing AC1 when I got it on Steam - and this was before I upgraded my GFX card so I had to play it in low settings back then. I played its sequel a few months after I upgraded my gfx card and on the 1 year anniversary of beating the first game ;p I played AC Brotherhood a year after that and Revelations just a few months ago (which was also a year after that). In terms of what I scored them.... Assassin's Creed Director's Cut (PC): 84 I plan to play AC3 soon as I said before and judge the game myself ;p I remember watching the trailers and getting hyped. I bought AC3 and Liberation last year's summer sale which is a trend since I've been buying one or two AC games every summer ever since I got into PC gaming back in 2012. Edit: And yes I always buy the complete edition or the closest to it even if it only has MP stuff only. AC 1 = Summer 2012 |
I like Assassin's Creed a lot, but the big problem is that they're so casual. It's a scandal that there aren't different difficulty levels!
I would rate them:
Assassin's Creed Director's Cut: 80 (the most challenging of them all and felt dark, I loved it)
Assassin's Creed II : 85 (the atmosphere was simply fantastic)
Assassin's Creed Brotherhood: 70 (too many meaningless features and unnecessary things, unengaging story)
Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag: 85 (Revival of the series. Probably the best AC since AC2)
I haven't played Revelations yet, and not AC3, nor the next gen ones.
It would be fun to know which team did which game and see if there's a correlation to quality.
The next Assassin's Creed game I will probably play is Assassin's Creed Rogue. I think it sounds very exciting to play a character on the Templar side!