By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC - Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

JEMC said:

48 million players use controllers on Steam
https://www.pcgamer.com/48-million-players-use-controllers-on-steam/
In a recent developer announcement about Steamworks tools, Valve gave some insight into the number of players using controllers on Steam, which is higher than ever and rising. "48 million players have used a controller in a game on Steam," writes Valve, with about 10 percent of daily game sessions being played with a controller."
Naturally these figures vary wildly across genre: for RTS games that figure is "frequently below 1 percent" whereas "many sports and fighting games see over 70 percent of sessions played with a controller, while racing and skating games can easily have over 90 percent of players using a controller." Third-person action games, your Assassin's Creeds and so on, fluctuate between 40-50 percent of players using controllers, while for FPSs it's "solidly in the range of 7-8 percent."

Cool, I only game on a controller with my PC plugged into a TV. It's interesting that if you would remove the esports multiplayer titles and PC exclusive genre's like strategy the % of controller gamers shoots up quite high in most single player games.

Controller support is already superb on Steam with 468/676 games in my collection either having full support or partial support which from every game I've played so far that says partial has been full support anyway or with something like a launcher to click play or having to click start on the title screen with a mouse (which I do on a controller anyway). For the remaining games that don't support it there there is usually good user made presets you can enable from Steam big screen mode.



Around the Network
WoodenPints said:
JEMC said:

48 million players use controllers on Steam
https://www.pcgamer.com/48-million-players-use-controllers-on-steam/
In a recent developer announcement about Steamworks tools, Valve gave some insight into the number of players using controllers on Steam, which is higher than ever and rising. "48 million players have used a controller in a game on Steam," writes Valve, with about 10 percent of daily game sessions being played with a controller."
Naturally these figures vary wildly across genre: for RTS games that figure is "frequently below 1 percent" whereas "many sports and fighting games see over 70 percent of sessions played with a controller, while racing and skating games can easily have over 90 percent of players using a controller." Third-person action games, your Assassin's Creeds and so on, fluctuate between 40-50 percent of players using controllers, while for FPSs it's "solidly in the range of 7-8 percent."

Cool, I only game on a controller with my PC plugged into a TV. It's interesting that if you would remove the esports multiplayer titles and PC exclusive genre's like strategy the % of controller gamers shoots up quite high in most single player games.

Controller support is already superb on Steam with 468/676 games in my collection either having full support or partial support which from every game I've played so far that says partial has been full support anyway or with something like a launcher to click play or having to click start on the title screen with a mouse (which I do on a controller anyway). For the remaining games that don't support it there there is usually good user made presets you can enable from Steam big screen mode.

I was actually surprised by some of the numbers as well. For example, I find it hard to understand why some would play an FPS with a controller on PC given how much better the k-board & mouse combo is, but there's an almost 10% of users that prefer to use one. I guess they're like you and play on a TV using the Big Picture mode.

And, on the other side, Third person action games usually play much, much better with a controller, specially if some form of driving is included, so learning that only half the players use one for those games is quite surprising.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

JEMC said:
WoodenPints said:

Cool, I only game on a controller with my PC plugged into a TV. It's interesting that if you would remove the esports multiplayer titles and PC exclusive genre's like strategy the % of controller gamers shoots up quite high in most single player games.

Controller support is already superb on Steam with 468/676 games in my collection either having full support or partial support which from every game I've played so far that says partial has been full support anyway or with something like a launcher to click play or having to click start on the title screen with a mouse (which I do on a controller anyway). For the remaining games that don't support it there there is usually good user made presets you can enable from Steam big screen mode.

I was actually surprised by some of the numbers as well. For example, I find it hard to understand why some would play an FPS with a controller on PC given how much better the k-board & mouse combo is, but there's an almost 10% of users that prefer to use one. I guess they're like you and play on a TV using the Big Picture mode.

And, on the other side, Third person action games usually play much, much better with a controller, specially if some form of driving is included, so learning that only half the players use one for those games is quite surprising.

I don't play in big picture mode just standard desktop with an Xbox controller as my mouse to navigate. Actually I started moving away from favouring Mouse+keyboard these past 5 years with probably 70-80% of my gaming been done on the controller then last year decided to replace the desk with a TV and now do everything via a Xbox controller.

I just generally find using a controller more fun and relaxing and would be one of those who choose to play a FPS on a controller whilst acknowledging m+k is probably the superior option for most of them not to mention it allows me to game more instead of my wrist and hands telling me to stop after a short period so age is probably a factor as well since I can't smash nerds 24/7 with my hands hovering on wasd like I used to back in 2000 on Quake 3.

Last edited by WoodenPints - on 05 March 2021

JEMC said:
Captain_Yuri said:

JPR: GPU shipments soar once more in Q4 2020

https://videocardz.com/press-release/jpr-gpu-shipments-soar-once-more-in-q4-2020

Of course, most of those gpus ended up in the hands of miners and scalpers.

AMD needs to get their shit together, they lost 1/3 of their marketshare in one year, and it won't be near as easy to get it back.

The problem this year (well, last year) is that the new Radeons came late and due to the enormous demand on all their products (CPUs, GPUs and Consoles), can't nearly fulfill all of them. Consoles go first due to not delivering here would be a contract breach, and due to the limited capacities at TSMC, there's not much volume left for the CPUs and the GPUs.

The CPUs had the advantage that they came a bit earlier and that they are also needed in the very lucrative server market, meaning GPUs really just get the leftovers in terms of production capacities right now, and as such can't produce nearly enough to cover demand, even though it's quite lower than for NVidias GPUs. In fact, NVidia going for Samsung 8nm instead of TSMC could mean they dodged quite a bullet here in terms of production capacity, as while Samsung's capacity is also stretched, it still allowed for more than would have been possible with TSMC now.



using your old diablo save? uhoh



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network

Intel Core i7-11700K Review: Blasting Off with Rocket Lake

https://www.anandtech.com/show/16535/intel-core-i7-11700k-review-blasting-off-with-rocket-lake

TLDR...

Slower than 5800X while needing more power!!!

Intel goofed hard!

Last edited by Jizz_Beard_thePirate - on 05 March 2021

                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

So I don't need to sell my 5900x?



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

vivster said:

So I don't need to sell my 5900x?

Not until Alder lake in a few months



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

JEMC said:

Mummelmann said:

That is a bunch of absolute bullshit. I've played about 2000 hours of FIFA since 2015 and can confirm that this is nowhere near true. And it's so blatant and obvious that I don't understand why they're even bothering at this point.

Well, they claim that they won't use the new DDA tech on those games, not that they're not using something else.

Also, you need to play better games .

In my defense; I play good games as well. :P Currently finishing my second playthrough of Pathfinder Kingmaker (which actually made me go out and buy Pathfinder Pen & Paper system!).

My spring PC plans seem to have taken a hit though, with GPU's being rare as unicorns, no properly tempting display being released any time soon, and now RAM seems to be hurtling towards the sky in regards to price. I recently read that memory sticks were increasing in price by around 10% per day at online retailers here, this was at the end of February. Damn it!



Ka-pi96 said:
Mummelmann said:

That is a bunch of absolute bullshit. I've played about 2000 hours of FIFA since 2015 and can confirm that this is nowhere near true. And it's so blatant and obvious that I don't understand why they're even bothering at this point.

Online multiplayer, or singleplayer?

Because I probably played FIFA 19 alone for 2000+ hours multiplayer only and I can confirm it's absolutely true.

We play a bit at work, mostly one-on-one. I mostly play Career Mode at home, that's where the majority of my time gets spent. I don't bother with Ultimate Team, gaming scam of the century, and fuel for many of EA's worst practices.

The AI in Career Mode gets obvious boosts and my team gets obvious nerfs - this is most evident when playing weaker sides. I've also played some PES 2020 and 2021, it's like night and day, I've yet to experience anything like this in those titles.