haxxiy said:
JEMC said:
But that has nothing to do with Nvidia nor AMD. They produce the chips and sell them to their AIB partners with fixes prices that have been stablished in contracts. They're only making more money because they're selling more chips. It's the likes of Asus, Gigabyte, MSI, etc that are inflating the prices of their cards and then there are also the stores raising their prices even more to reap the profits of this whole crypto bullsh*t. They're the ones that will see their profits fall like a rock when/if the current crypto crazy ends and, to be honest, I don't give a fuck if they have problems because of that. |
I'm not talking about the current cards, I'm talking about upcoming hardware. The gaming GPU market is not very profitable compared to the prosumer one, let alone the CPU market. And now, more than ever, they can hold the market on their own. Not that Nvidia and AMD would abandon it outright, mind, but I fully expect future cards to be increasingly worse in terms of price vs. performance compared to former generations. It's a golden opportunity to eventually charge $500-1000 for a ~ 200 mm2 chip like in the CPU space. Of course, a good theory has to allow some sort of prediction, so there you go: the upcoming Radeon cards, much like the vanilla 3060, will have a noticeably worse price vs. performance ratio compared to previous offerings. |
The gaming market has never been as profitable as the prosumer one, and never will. That hasn't stopped AMD and Nvidia from launching better products with each new iteration. And given that the chips powering the gaming cards are derivated from the prosumer models (we'll have to see how this goes with AMD now that they've splitted their resources to develop for both sides "independently"), I doubt that push or improvement will slow down... at least because of crypto and greed. The limit to reduce the transistor size and how expensive the new nodes are may come into play soon but, as I said, this will have nothing to do with the mining.
Those CPU prices may not hold in the future either if Apple's move succeeds and apreads into the PC market, where Nvidia can follow suit thanks to their purchase of ARM. Maybe CPU prices will have to come down to become attractive to a part of the market. Then again, the Celeron and Athom brands already take care of them so who knows. Also, all PCs need a CPU to work, but GPUs are an add-on, a luxury that not everbody needs, and as such, they can ask more because of it.
We don't know how much the new 6700XT will cost (the non-XT version has been delayed), but it wouldn't surprise me if their MSRP is too high for what they offer. The 6800s and 6900s are already a bit (~$50) too expensive given how they perform. At least they should give better performance per dollar than the 5700 XT, because they're not going to ask for $449 for it, right?
Please excuse my bad English.
Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.