Captain_Yuri said:
Chazore said:
nah, stick with it dude. I'm still going for a 3080 10gb model early next yr myself. I'll wait n' see what the 4000 series brings and decide then in a few yrs. Consoles have to do with what they've got this new gen, so I doubt we'll be heavily gimped with our VRAM.
|
Yea I am not worried about consoles since I am sure the 3080 can beat them the entire gen without any issues. It's just you know a game will come eventually that will be like doom where if u have a bit less Vram, you get lower performance at 4k. Still the 10gb will have very excellent performance mind you but this kinda practice is nonsense assuming it's even coming out anytime soon that is. Then again, if it does come out, it will probably be $100-$200 more expensive with little to no fps gain so could end up being one of those, may as well get the cheaper version.
|
Exactly.
I just don't see the 20gb variants being any better than the 3080 by a large margin, to offset the extra $200, and even then it'll never beat the 3090, otherwise if it cost a few more than the 3080, but beats the 3090, that'd make the 3090 entirely more pointless.
I think Nvidia screwed up here though, in doing this just now. They could have solved this by just forgoing the 10gb version and just make us wait till early next yr for the 20gb 3080 and make that the default, rather than pulling this "we've gotta out-spam AMD with as many ti's, gb's and Super's as much as possible!" idea they've got going.
Last edited by Chazore - on 19 September 2020
Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see
So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"