By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Could MK8, Bayo2 and X run on a PS3[60]

 

could they?

yes 280 32.52%
 
no 341 39.61%
 
maybe one of them could 124 14.40%
 
maybe two of them could 41 4.76%
 
see results 75 8.71%
 
Total:861
curl-6 on 26 June 2013
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:

Wii U has more of slow ram and a weak ass cpu

RAM layout hasn't been confirmed, and it has a GPGPU to assists the CPU in processing, which itself is actually not as weak as people think thanks to larger L2 cache than ps3/360, better IPC, out of order execution, and an audio DSP to offload sound processing.


Yet not a single game look better than halo 4, I know people are still expecting some special sauce from the gpu but it won't make a big difference, the wii U is maybe 1.1-1.3 time more powerful than the ps360 which pretty much means any games on the wii U could be made for the ps360 with minor downgrade in certain parts and upgrades in others

That none of the games look better than Halo 4 is opinion, not fact.

And do you have a technical basis for these 1.1/1.3 numbers?



Around the Network
ninjablade on 26 June 2013
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:

Wii U has more of slow ram and a weak ass cpu

RAM layout hasn't been confirmed, and it has a GPGPU to assists the CPU in processing, which itself is actually not as weak as people think thanks to larger L2 cache than ps3/360, better IPC, out of order execution, and an audio DSP to offload sound processing.


Yet not a single game look better than halo 4, I know people are still expecting some special sauce from the gpu but it won't make a big difference, the wii U is maybe 1.1-1.3 time more powerful than the ps360 which pretty much means any games on the wii U could be made for the ps360 with minor downgrade in certain parts and upgrades in others

That none of the games look better than Halo 4 is opinion, not fact.

And do you have a technical basis for these 1.1/1.3 numbers?

at least halo 4, uncharted 3, god of war, forza horizone can actually be explained why ther techically impressive, the only game that look techically impressive to me on wiiu is mario kart 8 and thats by currentgen standards.



cablebox on 26 June 2013
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:

Wii U has more of slow ram and a weak ass cpu

RAM layout hasn't been confirmed, and it has a GPGPU to assists the CPU in processing, which itself is actually not as weak as people think thanks to larger L2 cache than ps3/360, better IPC, out of order execution, and an audio DSP to offload sound processing.


Yet not a single game look better than halo 4, I know people are still expecting some special sauce from the gpu but it won't make a big difference, the wii U is maybe 1.1-1.3 time more powerful than the ps360 which pretty much means any games on the wii U could be made for the ps360 with minor downgrade in certain parts and upgrades in others

That none of the games look better than Halo 4 is opinion, not fact.

And do you have a technical basis for these 1.1/1.3 numbers?



and you do you have any basis for your claim that the cpu is not as weak as people think??

curl-6 on 26 June 2013
ninjablade said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:

Wii U has more of slow ram and a weak ass cpu

RAM layout hasn't been confirmed, and it has a GPGPU to assists the CPU in processing, which itself is actually not as weak as people think thanks to larger L2 cache than ps3/360, better IPC, out of order execution, and an audio DSP to offload sound processing.


Yet not a single game look better than halo 4, I know people are still expecting some special sauce from the gpu but it won't make a big difference, the wii U is maybe 1.1-1.3 time more powerful than the ps360 which pretty much means any games on the wii U could be made for the ps360 with minor downgrade in certain parts and upgrades in others

That none of the games look better than Halo 4 is opinion, not fact.

And do you have a technical basis for these 1.1/1.3 numbers?

at least halo 4, uncharted 3, god of war, forza horizone can actually be explained why ther techically impressive, the only game that look techically impressive to me on wiiu is mario kart 8 and thats by currentgen standards.

X's scale is technically impressive, you just choose not to ignore it and try to claim Red Dead's simple terrain, slow streaming, and poor lighting-shader unification is better.



Viper1 on 26 June 2013
g911turbo said:

I think a few people on these forums suffer from these two things *cough* Ninjablade *cough*.  I'm sure there are some more formal pyschological terms, but they escape me at the moment so I'll just describe them in lamens terms.

1.       You (Wii U) can't even compare to my worst (360, PS3), how dare you try to consider yourself comparable to my best (PS4,X1) attitude.  By artificially placing the wall of comparison further back (360,PS3), they feel it protects the integrity and greatness of that which they prefer (PS4,X1).  I could provide an example here but I think this is pretty self explanatory.

 

2.       Moving goal posts.  You can NEVER win.  You’re weaker than current systems.  Later on, you’re on par with current systems.  Later, you’re BARELY more powerful than current system.  You could prove tomorrow (official announcement lets say) that the Wii U is 600 ish GFLOPS.  Certain people on here would say “Yeah, but you cannot notice a difference between that and the 360, it’s not enough.  In order to notice the difference in graphics from last gen, you need about, 1.2 to 1.8 TFLOPS.”  Wow, how convenient!  Again, moving goal posts.  In many cases, point 2 ties in with point 1.


3 posts later....

cablebox said:

Yet not a single game look better than halo 4,





The rEVOLution is not being televised

Around the Network
curl-6 on 26 June 2013
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:

Wii U has more of slow ram and a weak ass cpu

RAM layout hasn't been confirmed, and it has a GPGPU to assists the CPU in processing, which itself is actually not as weak as people think thanks to larger L2 cache than ps3/360, better IPC, out of order execution, and an audio DSP to offload sound processing.


Yet not a single game look better than halo 4, I know people are still expecting some special sauce from the gpu but it won't make a big difference, the wii U is maybe 1.1-1.3 time more powerful than the ps360 which pretty much means any games on the wii U could be made for the ps360 with minor downgrade in certain parts and upgrades in others

That none of the games look better than Halo 4 is opinion, not fact.

And do you have a technical basis for these 1.1/1.3 numbers?


and you do you have any basis for your claim that the cpu is not as weak as people think??

Yep, the tweets of the guy who hacked the CPU, and Nintendo's own statements.



Anfebious on 26 June 2013

I think if they where downgraded ports we could see them... but we know that will never happen xD. Those games will stay on the wii u we like it or not.



"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"

cablebox on 26 June 2013
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:

Wii U has more of slow ram and a weak ass cpu

RAM layout hasn't been confirmed, and it has a GPGPU to assists the CPU in processing, which itself is actually not as weak as people think thanks to larger L2 cache than ps3/360, better IPC, out of order execution, and an audio DSP to offload sound processing.


Yet not a single game look better than halo 4, I know people are still expecting some special sauce from the gpu but it won't make a big difference, the wii U is maybe 1.1-1.3 time more powerful than the ps360 which pretty much means any games on the wii U could be made for the ps360 with minor downgrade in certain parts and upgrades in others

That none of the games look better than Halo 4 is opinion, not fact.

And do you have a technical basis for these 1.1/1.3 numbers?


and you do you have any basis for your claim that the cpu is not as weak as people think??

Yep, the tweets of the guy who hacked the CPU, and Nintendo's own statements.



link to the tweet please and I don't know about you but I take pr from the big 3 with a grain of salt they are known for bending the truth, I bet they didn't even use specifics in their PR but some vague wording that can be interpreted in many ways.

cablebox on 26 June 2013
Viper1 said:
g911turbo said:

I think a few people on these forums suffer from these two things *cough* Ninjablade *cough*.  I'm sure there are some more formal pyschological terms, but they escape me at the moment so I'll just describe them in lamens terms.

1.       You (Wii U) can't even compare to my worst (360, PS3), how dare you try to consider yourself comparable to my best (PS4,X1) attitude.  By artificially placing the wall of comparison further back (360,PS3), they feel it protects the integrity and greatness of that which they prefer (PS4,X1).  I could provide an example here but I think this is pretty self explanatory.

 

2.       Moving goal posts.  You can NEVER win.  You’re weaker than current systems.  Later on, you’re on par with current systems.  Later, you’re BARELY more powerful than current system.  You could prove tomorrow (official announcement lets say) that the Wii U is 600 ish GFLOPS.  Certain people on here would say “Yeah, but you cannot notice a difference between that and the 360, it’s not enough.  In order to notice the difference in graphics from last gen, you need about, 1.2 to 1.8 TFLOPS.”  Wow, how convenient!  Again, moving goal posts.  In many cases, point 2 ties in with point 1.


3 posts later....

cablebox said:

Yet not a single game look better than halo 4,





... excuse me, point me to that game that is superior to halo 4 plox, thk you good sir

Viper1 on 26 June 2013
cablebox said:
Viper1 said:
g911turbo said:

I think a few people on these forums suffer from these two things *cough* Ninjablade *cough*.  I'm sure there are some more formal pyschological terms, but they escape me at the moment so I'll just describe them in lamens terms.

1.       You (Wii U) can't even compare to my worst (360, PS3), how dare you try to consider yourself comparable to my best (PS4,X1) attitude.  By artificially placing the wall of comparison further back (360,PS3), they feel it protects the integrity and greatness of that which they prefer (PS4,X1).  I could provide an example here but I think this is pretty self explanatory.

 

2.       Moving goal posts.  You can NEVER win.  You’re weaker than current systems.  Later on, you’re on par with current systems.  Later, you’re BARELY more powerful than current system.  You could prove tomorrow (official announcement lets say) that the Wii U is 600 ish GFLOPS.  Certain people on here would say “Yeah, but you cannot notice a difference between that and the 360, it’s not enough.  In order to notice the difference in graphics from last gen, you need about, 1.2 to 1.8 TFLOPS.”  Wow, how convenient!  Again, moving goal posts.  In many cases, point 2 ties in with point 1.


3 posts later....

cablebox said:

Yet not a single game look better than halo 4,





... excuse me, point me to that game that is superior to halo 4 plox, thk you good sir

I never said there was one.  I just found it highly coincidental that he stated the exact situation you posted and it took only 3 posts later to happen.



The rEVOLution is not being televised