By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Could MK8, Bayo2 and X run on a PS3[60]

 

could they?

yes 280 32.52%
 
no 341 39.61%
 
maybe one of them could 124 14.40%
 
maybe two of them could 41 4.76%
 
see results 75 8.71%
 
Total:861
cablebox on 26 June 2013
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
watch dogs is more impressive then all those games so yes

More impressive in what way? That it looks better to you?

bigger world, more beautiful, more things on screen, if you played only wii last gen ofcourse they look impressive but for HD gamers they are nothing special and plenty of games look the same or better



Around the Network
Viper1 on 26 June 2013
Wyrdness said:
curl-6 said:

I do remember reading that, but google's not cooperating when I try to find it.


Click on where it says Joystiq in my post as it's actually a link, for some reason it's not highlighting like it normally does.

This is the link you were trying to post.  Not sure why the forum messed it up though.

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b245/VIdaluko/Dibujo-19_zps5ed4cf64.jpg



The rEVOLution is not being televised

curl-6 on 26 June 2013
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
watch dogs is more impressive then all those games so yes

More impressive in what way? That it looks better to you?

bigger world, more beautiful, more things on screen, if you played only wii last gen ofcourse they look impressive but for HD gamers they are nothing special and plenty of games look the same or better

I didn't play Wii only last gen, (Wii + 360) and they all look great to me, especially X.



cablebox on 26 June 2013
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
watch dogs is more impressive then all those games so yes

More impressive in what way? That it looks better to you?

bigger world, more beautiful, more things on screen, if you played only wii last gen ofcourse they look impressive but for HD gamers they are nothing special and plenty of games look the same or better

I didn't play Wii only last gen, (Wii + 360) and they all look great to me, especially X.

good for you but that doesn't make them to advance for the current gen hardware



Wyrdness on 26 June 2013
Viper1 said:
Wyrdness said:
curl-6 said:

I do remember reading that, but google's not cooperating when I try to find it.


Click on where it says Joystiq in my post as it's actually a link, for some reason it's not highlighting like it normally does.

This is the link you were trying to post.  Not sure why the forum messed it up though.

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b245/VIdaluko/Dibujo-19_zps5ed4cf64.jpg


Yeah thanks I don't know why that happened.



Around the Network
curl-6 on 26 June 2013
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
watch dogs is more impressive then all those games so yes

More impressive in what way? That it looks better to you?

bigger world, more beautiful, more things on screen, if you played only wii last gen ofcourse they look impressive but for HD gamers they are nothing special and plenty of games look the same or better

I didn't play Wii only last gen, (Wii + 360) and they all look great to me, especially X.

good for you but that doesn't make them to advance for the current gen hardware

I'd disagree. Wii U has more than twice as much RAM as PS3 and 360, and X and Bayo 2 look like they make use of this with their detailed expansive backdrops.



g911turbo on 26 June 2013
curl-6 said:

I didn't play Wii only last gen, (Wii + 360) and they all look great to me, especially X.

 

I think a few people on these forums suffer from these two things *cough* Ninjablade *cough*.  I'm sure there are some more formal pyschological terms, but they escape me at the moment so I'll just describe them in lamens terms.

1.       You (Wii U) can't even compare to my worst (360, PS3), how dare you try to consider yourself comparable to my best (PS4,X1) attitude.  By artificially placing the wall of comparison further back (360,PS3), they feel it protects the integrity and greatness of that which they prefer (PS4,X1).  I could provide an example here but I think this is pretty self explanatory.

 

2.       Moving goal posts.  You can NEVER win.  You’re weaker than current systems.  Later on, you’re on par with current systems.  Later, you’re BARELY more powerful than current system.  You could prove tomorrow (official announcement lets say) that the Wii U is 600 ish GFLOPS.  Certain people on here would say “Yeah, but you cannot notice a difference between that and the 360, it’s not enough.  In order to notice the difference in graphics from last gen, you need about, 1.2 to 1.8 TFLOPS.”  Wow, how convenient!  Again, moving goal posts.  In many cases, point 2 ties in with point 1.



cablebox on 26 June 2013
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:
watch dogs is more impressive then all those games so yes

More impressive in what way? That it looks better to you?

bigger world, more beautiful, more things on screen, if you played only wii last gen ofcourse they look impressive but for HD gamers they are nothing special and plenty of games look the same or better

I didn't play Wii only last gen, (Wii + 360) and they all look great to me, especially X.

good for you but that doesn't make them to advance for the current gen hardware

I'd disagree. Wii U has more than twice as much RAM as PS3 and 360, and X and Bayo 2 look like they make use of this with their detailed expansive backdrops.

Wii U has more of slow ram and a weak ass cpu



curl-6 on 26 June 2013
cablebox said:

Wii U has more of slow ram and a weak ass cpu

RAM layout hasn't been confirmed, and it has a GPGPU to assists the CPU in processing, which itself is actually not as weak as people think thanks to larger L2 cache than ps3/360, better IPC, out of order execution, and an audio DSP to offload sound processing.



cablebox on 26 June 2013
curl-6 said:
cablebox said:

Wii U has more of slow ram and a weak ass cpu

RAM layout hasn't been confirmed, and it has a GPGPU to assists the CPU in processing, which itself is actually not as weak as people think thanks to larger L2 cache than ps3/360, better IPC, out of order execution, and an audio DSP to offload sound processing.



Yet not a single game look better than halo 4, I know people are still expecting some special sauce from the gpu but it won't make a big difference, the wii U is maybe 1.1-1.3 time more powerful than the ps360 which pretty much means any games on the wii U could be made for the ps360 with minor downgrade in certain parts and upgrades in others