To those "not affected": you don't lend games to your friends? you don't go on holidays with your console? you don't change internet providers/accommodation every now and then, thus not having a connection for a few days?
I don't think "it doesn't affect ME" is a good way to defend this anyway.
Negatives:
1.- No taking your console anywhere with no internet (people on holidays, college students, etc.)
2.- No gaming after MS closes the Bone's servers. You will be able to play your NES games but not the Bone's. It's a long rental.
3.- Basically, no gaming for those who don't have an internet connection (rural areas, developing countries, people who just use 3G, etc.)
4.- No lending games (one time giving only, can't have the game back).
5.- No renting games.
6.- No 2nd hand (most probably, as developers can choose to block it).
7.- Mom & pop stores closing because of this (and maybe large chains too).
8.- No reason to buy disks anymore, which reinforces point 7.
9.- Not DRM related, but still no clarification (even after this list) on whether Kinect can send information about age, gender, etc. to advertisers.
And I'm sure other things I'm forgetting.
Positives: None.
(copy-paste from another thread)
I think those defending this suffer from the Stockholm Syndrome.
User has been warned for this post
yo_john117