| TimCliveroller said: commeon . Tell me the last multi-milion game with shit graphics? |
![]() |
Mario Kart Wii
|
Or this is not a "real game"?
| TimCliveroller said: commeon . Tell me the last multi-milion game with shit graphics? |
![]() |
Mario Kart Wii
|
Or this is not a "real game"?
No wonder their games blow (to me). Visuals are important - no doubt. But I am not sure if it should be as high as 60%. I understand their philosophy because I do believe visuals are important, but smaller indie games have proven you do not have to provide gamers with impressive visuals to have a great game.
59% sounds better. 
Playstation = The Beast from the East

Sony + Nintendo = WIN! PS3 + PSV + PS4 + Wii U + 3DS
ghost_of_fazz said:
Or this is not a "real game" |
I said "shit". 3rd Party 360 ps3 anyone?

Ex Graphics Whore.
TimCliveroller said:
I said "shit". 3rd Party 360 ps3 anyone? |
![]() |
Saints Row: The Third
|
And it sold good on the 360 too. Not to mention the horrible PC port, that sold good too.
ghost_of_fazz said:
And it sold good on the 360 too. Not to mention the horrible PC port, that sold good too. |
Haven't played it. Does it actually look that bad?

Ex Graphics Whore.
| TimCliveroller said: Haven't played it. Does it actually look that bad? |
Looks bad, well into the 6th generation territory. And the PC version looks even worse, because it's poorly optimized.
Luckily, the game itself is very fun to play, so fun that it overcomes it's bad graphics.
60% of *their* games, certainly...

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
| kljesta64 said: tetris |
Agree. when i play tetris 60% of my enjoyment does not come from the graphics.
That's hilarious, considering the top 15 best-selling games of all time, ever, are Nintendo games. All of them.
And not a single one of them has what would generally be considered 'great' graphics. Not even at the time they released.
Then again, I suspect the guy was talking about Crytek's own games, probably.
Nintendo Network ID: Cheebee 3DS Code: 2320 - 6113 - 9046


