bla bla bla... cell

Ex Graphics Whore.
PayaV87 said:
I just had a tear, when I was thinking about that 400 MB of awesomeness.
My favorite game of all time. I can't wait to see, what Naughty Dog does with 7 GB of RAM. |
I just filled the cup thinking about what Sony first party will do with the 7GB of ram. OMGoogle!
This will be more than enough for most developers. They will struggle to use all of it. It's no wonder they put a livestream feature in now and stuff like video chat. Hopefully, the OS in game is super fast, it's too slow on PS3 at times
Xbox Series, PS5 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch 2 will outsell the PS5 by 2030
Uncharted next gen will stop being linear. With all that ram they can make huge spaces for Drake to roam around and increase the length of gameplay.
| the2real4mafol said: This will be more than enough for most developers. They will struggle to use all of it. It's no wonder they put a livestream feature in now and stuff like video chat. Hopefully, the OS in game is super fast, it's too slow on PS3 at times |
at time? More like all the time!
XMB is great in design - love it compared to NXE on the Xbox 360, it just runs like a dog when anything is loaded.
That's a bit OT though.
As someone said earlier...
I'm expecting a 6GB/2GB split or possibly even more in favour of the OS and additional background tasks.
walsufnir said:
I thing I have to comment on this, not saying anything counterwise. The ram-talk on this site is getting ridiculous to me. The problem with ram is one thing: if you have ram that isn't sufficient a game will suffer. If Sony had built ps4 with 4 gb of whatever ram you can imagine it would have still suffered of being less than 8 gb than nextbox. I know that ppl would have argued that the speed of gddr5 would make it still better but that nonsense. It is always the size of ram which is really making a difference, not necessarily the bandwidth which is only one side of the medal of truth. Less ram can't be bought on "sideways". It would be true if you build a system of 8 gb ram with ps/2-fp-ram, but that's not going to happen. The combination of bandwidth and latency is crucial for performance is crucial, yes. But that's it, because ram only serves the computational units. Because of the big amounts of ram gives devs the opportunity to build games we can all look forward to. No matter if DDR3 or GDDR5. |
I'm 50/50 with you on this one. While I agree that amount of RAM matters more than bandwidth, both are important. You can't really say that 4GB of GDDR5 would be inferior to 8GB of DDR3. It really depends on the game.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
Go and check out some old nfo intros done using less than 100kb of RAM and prepare to buy yourself a new wardrobe then.
| the2real4mafol said: This will be more than enough for most developers. They will struggle to use all of it. It's no wonder they put a livestream feature in now and stuff like video chat. Hopefully, the OS in game is super fast, it's too slow on PS3 at times |
They will use all of it by the time the gen is over. The Witcher 2 used 3GB of ram on PC.
S.T.A.G.E. said:
|
I expect a huge increase in RAM use in PC now that consoles have more RAM too... PC games will finally move ahead from Crysis in 2007.