RolStoppable said:
Soundwave said:
Well lets see here. Lets say I'm a parent. I bust my ass at work every day to provide for my family. I have some young kids, the wifey tells me to go get them a game console as a birthday/Christmas gift.
Looking at Best Buy.com for 2 minutes to see their retail prices + factoring in a $99.99 XBox 360 ... I can get
XBox 360 Console - $99.99 (lets assume this rumor is true)
Lego Star Wars Collection - $19.99
Lego Harry Potter Years 1-4 - $19.99
Soul Calibur V - $19.99 (good for two boys)
Viva Pinata - $14.99
Skylanders (Starter Pack w/3 figures + base) - $74.99
Total - $250
Can't even get a basic Wii U for that.
|
Oh, I see. You are talking about kids' first video game system. That market isn't interested in the latest and greatest anyway, because kids break things. The only question is going to be why those parents would choose a 360 over a Wii that has the same games, plus much better substitutes for those exclusives you mentioned. Would kids rather play Viva Pinata or Mario? Does the average parent know Viva Pinata or Mario? Microsoft totally has the advantage here.
|
Nintendo has banked on this formula before "don't worry kids will choose Mario no matter what", but for 10 years it was wrong. If Nintendo doesn't offer a complete package, then people simply go elsewhere (see: more kids grew up with a Playstation than an N64, and more kids grew up with a PS2 rather than a GameCube). Kids simply like video games, if there isn't Mario, then they'll play Crash Bandicoot or Spyro.
Things like Skylanders, LEGO, Disney, Star Wars, Kinect, sports games, etc. are all on the 360. Kids aren't really that narrowminded, they go into a store and find a 100 interesting things on every system just by looking at the box art.
I think even a lot of households that are Wii-only this past gen, but they're looking to upgrade to something else now, may say "y'know this Wii U is interesting, but this 360 has a lot of fun games too, and is much, much cheaper". It's a tough sell.