By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 55- The Venture Brothers

Nachomamma8 said:
NoCtiS_NoX said:

Sorry if I am not clear enough with my post.

The one I linked is just contradictory on his part.

And as for the cautious part it's for his play this round. I worded a better word, "Consious".

self-conscious still doesn't quite work for both links


The one I linked is just contradictory on his part.

read. 

I am telling you guys that  I feel he is being conscious with this round.

As for the boring part. whatever. It's that the only thing you can say?



Around the Network

I'm not feeling good about spurge being so quiet. He'd be harassing all of the lurkers and pushing the game for more participation. Unless he wants a quiet game, or he lost interest in the game.

Vote: Spurge.



NoCtiS_NoX said:
Nachomamma8 said:
NoCtiS_NoX said:

Sorry if I am not clear enough with my post.

The one I linked is just contradictory on his part.

And as for the cautious part it's for his play this round. I worded a better word, "Consious".

self-conscious still doesn't quite work for both links

 

The one I linked is just contradictory on his part.

 read. 

I am telling you guys that  I feel he is being conscious with this round.

As for the boring part. whatever. It's that the only thing you can say?

 

just making sure because you didn't mention anything about being contradictory originally

and i can say a lot more than "boring", but we're making a change this round. less reasons, more rhetoric.



benao87 said:

I'm not feeling good about spurge being so quiet. He'd be harassing all of the lurkers and pushing the game for more participation. Unless he wants a quiet game, or he lost interest in the game.

Vote: Spurge.

don't give your enemy excuses while attacking him.



benao87 said:
spurgeonryan said:
@ nacho

Didn't you die day one after outlandishly telling everyone to lynch me? I did not thin k you woukd do that as scum. But others obviously did. You put yourself out there, which is dangerous as scum. I should have realized when you had no real good reasons. Although no one did at the time and you were not my only attacker.

On Astro. He does not have nen to direct him this time so it seems like he may struggle. Possible scum mistakes Imo. As stefl said, " scum Yves their own cookie out".

What Prof? What do you see in noctis? Nothing so far. Although he is not tunneljng me, so there goes one town tell. ;-p


Nacho was caught because of nen's play, it wasn't his game that was punished, it was nen's move that was a hit.

@Stefl -.-, ironically that gives me a town read on you.

I'm with prof, astro gives me bad readings but I wouldn't be comfortable supporting his lynching day one.

Sorry but why wouldn't you be comfortable lynching astro?



Around the Network

I was going to leave it alone for a bit, but since the day is getting closer and closer to a draw, Stefl, what were you doing when you said "thanks for the cookie" to benao? I heard your response to Nacho, but it was a pretty superficial accusation in the first place...and then benao said that ironically gives him a town read. Were you really fishing for a reaction, or just joking around?



spurgeonryan said:

@ benoa

If you would like I could say you are lurking ;-p but this is a super small game and they usually play out like this. Lurking is more for after day one on games like these, where I will point it out to death!


You couldn't. And, well, you're right, you did start accusing lurkers from mid game until the end. Still, you are strangely quiet, just after all the discussion of your typo.

theprof00 said:
benao87 said:


Nacho was caught because of nen's play, it wasn't his game that was punished, it was nen's move that was a hit.

@Stefl -.-, ironically that gives me a town read on you.

I'm with prof, astro gives me bad readings but I wouldn't be comfortable supporting his lynching day one.

Sorry but why wouldn't you be comfortable lynching astro?

I still see him as a new player, as I consider myself, I feel like giving him a stronger benefit of the doubt. That and the thing that the base of the accusation is not a definite one, that gives me enough reason to fully accuse him.



Mario, how's it goin?



benao87 said:

I still see him as a new player, as I consider myself, I feel like giving him a stronger benefit of the doubt. That and the thing that the base of the accusation is not a definite one, that gives me enough reason to fully accuse him.

Why is that?

See, my first assumption was that you weren't confident in voting because you didn't believe he was scum, as you wrote above in the second sentence.

My own reasons for not lynching are because despite thinking he's a good choice, it's just not fair to lynch new players.

I don't think I ever gave noobs the benefit of the doubt when I was a noob, so I'm curious as to why you feel he needs protecting.



theprof00 said:
benao87 said:

I still see him as a new player, as I consider myself, I feel like giving him a stronger benefit of the doubt. That and the thing that the base of the accusation is not a definite one, that gives me enough reason to fully accuse him.

Why is that?

See, my first assumption was that you weren't confident in voting because you didn't believe he was scum, as you wrote above in the second sentence.

My own reasons for not lynching are because despite thinking he's a good choice, it's just not fair to lynch new players.

I don't think I ever gave noobs the benefit of the doubt when I was a noob, so I'm curious as to why you feel he needs protecting.

You don't want him as a day 1 lynch because of a new player policy, and I feel like because of the same thing, and one that I share I'd like to extend him a stronger benefit of the doubt. I don't see that those two positions are that different. Yours being more formal, mine being more personal. At the end is the same thing.

And there is the other thing, I'm not convinced enough that he is scum to deny him that benefit, say we wouldn't had any other suspect.