theprof00 said:
Why is that? See, my first assumption was that you weren't confident in voting because you didn't believe he was scum, as you wrote above in the second sentence. My own reasons for not lynching are because despite thinking he's a good choice, it's just not fair to lynch new players. I don't think I ever gave noobs the benefit of the doubt when I was a noob, so I'm curious as to why you feel he needs protecting. |
You don't want him as a day 1 lynch because of a new player policy, and I feel like because of the same thing, and one that I share I'd like to extend him a stronger benefit of the doubt. I don't see that those two positions are that different. Yours being more formal, mine being more personal. At the end is the same thing.
And there is the other thing, I'm not convinced enough that he is scum to deny him that benefit, say we wouldn't had any other suspect.
