By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Diablo 3 console port 'not necessarily a Sony exclusive', says dev

CGI-Quality said:
Nsanity said:
CGI-Quality said:
Nsanity said:
CGI-Quality said:
Nsanity said:
CGI-Quality said:

In your haste, you forgot to post the source

Haste? CVG is wrote on top of the page.

If I can't click in the OP to go to the source, what good does "CVG" do?

You could try Googling CVG.

Or you could just add a sorce. 

The source is CVG.

Read the edit, Nsanity. And quit being so difficult about something that should be there in the first place.

You are the one making a big deal out of nothing.



Around the Network

Of course it isn't exclusive I could've said this the day it was announced.

Blizzard is owned by Activision. Activision has zero interest in exclusives on consoles. Not to mention Blizzard has been waiting to return to consoles for years and they aren't going to waste the opportunity by going Sony only.

The days of 3rd party exclusives are dead. Games cost far too much money to limit your user base



Nsanity said:

You are the one making a big deal out of nothing.


Nope, I agree with him.  It's just a simple rule of making threads.  If you're posting an article, link to the source.

You make so many threads I thought you'd have picked up on this by now.



BenVTrigger said:
Of course it isn't exclusive I could've said this the day it was announced.

Blizzard is owned by Activision. Activision has zero interest in exclusives on consoles. Not to mention Blizzard has been waiting to return to consoles for years and they aren't going to waste the opportunity by going Sony only.

The days of 3rd party exclusives are dead. Games cost far too much money to limit your user base

This.

The Xbox has a large WRPG fanbase, so they aren't gonna pass on that.

Blizzard has even advertised a few games on the 360 dashboard. Clearly they know they have an audience there.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

of course not, it's already out on PC.



Around the Network

I already knew this. They dodged this question back during the Gametrailers post-show after PS4 reveal.
Now, is this a timed-exclusive or will it just say "Playstation!" at the end of the advertisements?

I choose the latter. As much as I would love a game of this caliber to be a timed-exclusive, this isn't a business practice I'm happy about being on the other end of...