By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Kojima’s Fox Engine x Real Life (Plus Fake Interview Using Fox Engine?)

 

Joakim Mogren is CG or Real?

Kojima 74 52.48%
 
CG 22 15.60%
 
Real 20 14.18%
 
I don't know 10 7.09%
 
Total:126
ethomaz on 15 March 2013



Around the Network
antfromtashkent on 15 March 2013

So Joakim = Kojima.

What is Mogren?

 

Edit: Sorry off topic, my mind wondered a bit...



JoeTheBro on 15 March 2013

FUCK YOU VIACOM!!! OP, we need another source for the video. Does Viacom even have rights to this lol?

And I highly doubt this is not a real person sitting in a real chair.



Links

ethomaz on 15 March 2013
JoeTheBro said:
FUCK YOU VIACOM!!! OP, we need another source for the video. Does Viacom even have rights to this lol?

And I highly doubt this is not a real person sitting in a real chair.


Another source...



Chark on 15 March 2013

Where did the ! mark go at the end of that spike video? Someone messed up.



Before the PS3 everyone was nice to me :(

Around the Network
PlaystaionGamer on 15 March 2013

That guy is clearly real



ethomaz on 15 March 2013

lol gaf consensus were this guy is CG.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=524364

- The twitter account from this guy was created after the interview
- This guy doesn't exists in Sweden



SxyxS on 15 March 2013

what I don't understand.

While playing conqer on xbox359 ,i remember how great conquers fur looked like(just in the beginning of the game,the intro, there is a close up)and I thought hair and fur will look great on ps360=problem solved.But it wasn't solved and conquers fur is still the best looking virtual hairy thing on consoles.
Now,two generations later the face of the guy looks almost photorealistic(not for the nit-picking,bean and polygon counting pc master race,but for the average console gamer) but the hair still look like plastic-why?



ethomaz on 15 March 2013

Cleared up the Twitter image a little. Tried to offer more definition. No matter what I did there was no definable definition on the neck area.

Also worth noting that messing with the levels of the image showed some rather interesting artifacts on everything apart from his head. Suggesting a higher resolution image has been layered atop the low resolution body.

Points worth noting:

  • The upper eyelids only half drop. The attached skin doesn't move at all. (i.e. the eyebrow, the recess below the eyebrow)
  • The lower eyelids simply don't move. I don't know about you, but I can't move my upper eyelids independently of the lower. More-so, when you are shocked or taken aback by something, the natural is to winch/squint.
  • The point of light in his pupil doesn't move in relation to his head movement. In fact it's static within the pupil at all times.
  • The shadows around the bandages on the right of the image are not consistent with the head movement 


ethomaz on 15 March 2013

I have to agree the point of light in the eye not moved any time in the video... it is impossible.

CG.