Super Mario RPG 2!
If they make this game successful they can make tons of $$$
^ Imagine that one of the collaborations Iwata mentioned was indeed Super Mario RPG 2...
Even if that becomes real, that`s the kind of stuff that only appears at E3.
DigitalDevilSummoner said:
Did you say minority ?! There's this band by the name Tool, who have a song called "the Pot", look it up. |
The game has a freaking 85 metascore. People who have actually played it tend to like it. So yeah, I said minority. Come at me bro.
Check it out. The game has a user score around 4.5/10 on Metacritic. What do you see here?
the_dengle said:
The game has a freaking 85 metascore. People who have actually played it tend to like it. So yeah, I said minority. Come at me bro. Check it out. The game has a user score around 4.5/10 on Metacritic. What do you see here?
|
i compare the user reviews! Look at Fire emblem 92! User score 9.3. That means the game is good!
the_dengle said:
The game has a freaking 85 metascore. People who have actually played it tend to like it. So yeah, I said minority. Come at me bro. Check it out. The game has a user score around 4.5/10 on Metacritic. What do you see here?
|
You do realise you just shot yourself in the leg, don't you ?
(I will give you a hint: the metascore reviewers are the minority compared to the users )
FFXIII Lightning and U
I expect nothing from them, in fact FFCC was only reason i never owned or bought Gamecube, with this game Nintendo fell to the bottom
| tbone51 said: i compare the user reviews! Look at Fire emblem 92! User score 9.3. That means the game is good! |
That's not my point. DMC is good, hence its very positive critical reception. "Fans" of the series destroyed the user score by bombarding the game with extremely low scores. A lot of 0s. Many of them without playing the game at all.
This isn't exactly uncommon on Metacritic, but usually it happens in small enough numbers not to affect the user score greatly. In this case, it creates a very misleading picture. More people gave the game a good score than a bad score, yet its overall score is under 5. It's sabotage... by a vocal minority.
DigitalDevilSummoner said:
You do realise you just shot yourself in the leg, don't you ? (I will give you a hint: the metascore reviewers compared to the users are the minority) |
How about I give YOU a hint? More people gave the game a positive score than a negative one. Your definition of "minority" is pretty funny if 160/352 doesn't fit it!
That's about 45% of user scores. So it doesn't count the 62 positive critical reviews to 0 negative ones; let's add those. Now it's 160/417. This amounts to about 38% -- compared to 57% giving it a positive score.
Maybe you just don't know how to read graphs. The longer line represents a larger number.
Some old port or multiplatform game? meh, dont care about it - not interesting.
Some exclusive 3rd party game NOT being some grey-brown Shooter? well maybe.
Some exclusive 3rd party game with long play time and a lot of fantasy in it? (I promise, i do NOT refer to final fantasy - i just wanna have something which is not hyper-realistic) Sounds pretty good.
Some exclusive 3rd party JRPG game with turn based battle system where i can control all my party member on my own, which has a giant world and is pretty colourful (remembering old SNES JRPGs)? MUST BUY!!!
But i guess it will be some port of an old game or a normal multiplat game, which comes 6month or so later to WiiU and so nobody cares about that. Then SE will complain, nobody buying their games on WiiU and stop support it.
Every news better that that would really really surprise me - i am serious.
the_dengle said:
That's not my point. DMC is good, hence its very positive critical reception. "Fans" of the series destroyed the user score by bombarding the game with extremely low scores. A lot of 0s. Many of them without playing the game at all. This isn't exactly uncommon on Metacritic, but usually it happens in small enough numbers not to affect the user score greatly. In this case, it creates a very misleading picture. More people gave the game a good score than a bad score, yet its overall score is under 5. It's sabotage... by a vocal minority. |
my bad, i read it wrong. Yea it happens alot unfortunately. Like here with the polls. EX You ask if Wii U will sell good. People who dont like Nintendo will automatically put it'll flop(in polls). Thats why it should only be rated if ou have the game!
As if its what people wish for aka a J-RPG/Final Fantasy
PAX East - Means probably something from the Eidos Side at SquareEnix
The SquareEnix guy at the PS4 Presentation already said look forward to the E3 if you want news about a NEW Final Fantasy(probably FF15)
They won't waste Final Fantasy before the E3 and especially not for the WiiU as an exclusive and the Luminous Engine will be key anyway.They want to impress and push hardware from the beginning this time.They have to get back to their standards they had before this Gen.
Let's think about what SquareEnix/Eidos could have cause this is more possible than Final Fantasy/Kingdom Hearts etc
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
