The intersection of people that believe man evolved from an African ape-like creature AND that a God caused it all is already pretty small.
Then you had to go and assign a genetic make-up to this all-powerful creator based on the small variations shown by our species on this planet, assuming that this all powerful God would resemble the earlier variants.
Completely ignoring the fact that we as humans are pitiful in most respects, you ascribe to this eternal, transcendent person a designation which holds no value whatsoever in any actual sense.
Not to mention your omission, or rather unbeknownst acknowledgement that even though evolution is a continuous process in the vein of calculus, you for some reason assign more value to a later-developed specimen and somehow ignores the numberless species that came before. This is a tremendous paradox as you are assigning a type of godliness to the first men, but not to the species before them. The only solution to this paradox is to designate later-developed humanoids as more godly, otherwise we eventually end up at the "God is a single celled organism" (or something of the like) statement.
Of course you could be flying the "He made is in His image" flag, but if you will be quoting from 2000 year old texts to make (what I have tried to show up till now) no point at all, then I'd have to throw hundreds of quotes from that self-same text right back at you that are no-doubt in direct contradiction with (at least some of) your inherent belief systems; Effectively shattering your concept of reality.
So what is it you are trying to do?