Linkzmax said:
How is it cherrypicking when it is the ONLY mention of me you made?
happydolphin said:
Linkzmax said:
You are making this up to suit your case, because a) I am fairly certain you admitted to not paying much attention in the early game of that round(and I am going to fact check this) and 2) I was playing catch up most of Day One because of how quickly it exploded. There was no aggression until I was adamant that tabaha would not be lynched due to a BS claim by a stupid day-vig, which was quite a few days after it started.
|
We'll have to meet in the middle because though I was active all game I missed day 2. That's it. I think I pegged you scum early on though (day 1) and it got worse on day 3.
I don't know why you think I'm making this up. They asked me my reads and I gave them. Now you're being critical again, which is a scum tell again (getting aggressive when pegged).
|
You are correct that when you reappeared from your hiatus(rereading page 27 by 100s is quite hilarious) on day 3 you jumped in a random direction and called me scum.
|
It's cherrypicking in the sense that you're sticking to what I said and not to the meaning. I said day 1, I'll admit it was an exaggeration, but the fact is that that game lasted 7 days, and so day 3 is pretty early. Add to the fact that I hadn't read any of day 2 and when I got back I was getting updated, my reads on you were based on day 1 (though a bit after the post you quoted).
Now I remember why I thought it was based on my day 1 reads. It's cause it was. My first post in day 3 saying we should go after you or FF with no knowledge of day 2 proves that. ;)
So it's cherrypicking, and I also know now that I can stick to my claim after all (it was a day 1 read after all). In the end, I was suspicious of you back then because of your play (aggressive), but knowing you were town that game, it makes me think that that's the town you and that the nice you is not the town you.