You started a debate that it's too convenient for him to claim cop when the cop dies. Mario claimed deputy( deputy replaced a cop when the cop is lynch or killed). Also having this debate, he is not doing a good job lying here and there so instead of tyring to find out if he is the deputy or not, you are willing to vote for spurge were mario wouldn't be proven 100% that he is the cop and You will still have doubts that he is telling the truth when day 4 comes.

FoS on that HappyD.

HoS benao

Why? His play started to become very different.

UNVOTE: Spruge scum

VOTE: Zero

I really think it scummy how you reacted to Mario's claim.

I assumed he was bluffing when he said he scaned you, but you got overly defensive becouse you didnt consider that fact

....coze your scum ?

You didnt have to role claim yet >_>

Anwho that means your telling the truth or we have a 2nd mafia team.

How many shots do you have ? And who did you target these past few nights.

What about Nacho dofus :P

spurgeonryan said:
Bullshit. You are not. Also I know you have not scanned me....



Wanna continue?

Townie response, com one mario just say who you scanned.

You will live another day and can try new tactis tomorow now lets see if you scanned HappyD, Noctis or Yoshi (like I'm hoping)

You got like 2 people who really suspect you....ease up man :(

Also Mario is using a good tactic......badly. He's probably messing with  Ya...........I hope.

Now stop getting  angry wil every damn post and play for fun for once.

You could've at least backed me up when my head with losing MP (Mind points) aginst Zero >_>

Vote: Zero

Wellat least you listed to me :)

I disagree with you observation, I think Yoshi's repponse was more scummy than Spurg's.....minues the role claim of course.

I suggest you scan HappyD or Spurg  tomorow .

Any result is good result from now on....guilty or inoccent.

Spurg the moment you return i want a list of your night targets.....

One of his statements effectively said that he had a guilty scan on me, how was I supposed to know he was lying? In that scenerio wouldn't you vote for the person that seemed to be lying to get you lynched?

Also, talking about lying, we have a scenerio in which either Mario or Spurge is lying (he couldn't have both been blocked and got guilty scan in the same Night). The easiest way to find who is lying is to vote for Zero because if Mario is telling the truth, we get two scum with zero loss for town and if Mario is lying we lose an unclaimed role at the cost of one scum and a confirmed townie.

Vote: Zero

Unless he was lying, he's already said that he blocked HappyD Night 1 and Mario Night 2.

On a seperate note, I am even more convinced that Spurge is scum after have a quick look back to find these results. When Mario came in saying he had information Spurge didn't react at all. It wasn't until Mario made it look like he had information on Spurge that Spurge claimed that he had roleblocked Mario.

Something we need to discuss now:

We didn't have any case of poisoning last night...and that can be attributed to 2 reasons.

1- Rol was blocked and killed last night.
Mafia wont do that kind of combo unless they knew they were dealing with killing role
meaning the mafia have a role cop in their ranks.

2- The poisoner is a mafia role (1xshot) who used his ability night 1.
That means Rol is a normal SK and the second kill we had night1 and 2 were his not the vigilantist's.

I'm leaning towards the 2nd reason because the vigilant night1 kill was a bit rash
and Nacho was supposibly is the mafia role blocker
plus prof should've revealed that Rol was the poisoner in his flip
and most of all its more probable than assuming Rol was scanned then blocked then killed.

And If the poisoner is a mafia role then the mafia group is 4 members max and we have
two remaining. If Zero is one then we just need to get the last of them.
Like I said mafia are fewer than average, but they make for it in abilities.
Seth role suggest we have a bulletproof?