I find that in this day and age I'm always really impressed when I come across someone who is good at debating, refuting points and building up advanced and insightful arguments without making the too hard to comprehend for someone not as well versed on the subject, it truly is a rarity.
The world is full of people who think they are good at this though...

I think that's one of the main attractions in the opposite sex with me, being able to answer and being able to answer well. These people often have a great sense of humor as well.

So, am I allowed to continue on with horrible debates? I am only 14, after all...

Are you coming on to me right now?

you are seriously just 14?

Yeah. My profile says so. I wouldn't lie about that.

holy fuck you are young! 

He means 41. He's dyslexic, don't make fun.

He's a 41 y/o man living in his mother's basement. Is that how it goes? MBP and APM know his story better than I do.

Oh, so it's not me per se. It's the fact that I remind you of spurge. Well don't worry, he'll be back soon. Though, I don't think GCI will be pleased to hear this.

The only one I don't do is the last one about not calling people idiots and their ideas dumb and acting like a grown adult. Since I still have a couple of years to go before I'm legally one, though, I'm fine on that one.

Besides, I usually have very cogent reasoning for why people are idiots and their ideas are dumb.

For example, your comparison to the 18th century is dumb. It's based on some semi-romanticized view of 18th century intellectuals who, despite having some decent ideas, were not necessarily superior to any future peoples by any objective measure. No need to be such an Enlightenment fanboy. This makes it look like you're an idiot, you know? Also, you make reference to some Jerry Stringer. I can only understand this as some sort of strawman argument you're trying to make. Fail!