BuckStud said:
|
no it doesn't. we can't say for sure what % of PS3's sold were for the purpose of being BluRay movie players.
BuckStud said:
|
no it doesn't. we can't say for sure what % of PS3's sold were for the purpose of being BluRay movie players.
cookingyourmama said:
Lol wow, just wow, to quote a word you used yourself, delusional. |
Last gen XBox Sold 24 million consoles, PS2 sold 155 million. So who gained market share?????? Who gained the most third party support? Final Fantasy, Metal Gear, Resident Evil... Demon/Dark Souls in general, Star Ocean, Tales games, Castlevania both SOTN & LOS., Prince of Persia, Devil May Cry, Ace combat, Ridge Racer........
Units sold don't mean shit if you lost 5 billion dollars.
"Sony has lost ~5 billion dollars on the PS3. It is the worst financial disaster in gaming history, losing more money for its parent company than either the Dreamcast or original Xbox."
So I'm delusional. YOu only care about how many moved units, nothing else. Wow talk about hearing what you want to hear. not the business end. WTF do you think they are doing it for? YOU!!! Lolololol. It's for money.
For a company that moved 155 million units last gen. They should have passed MS in the first year however they still have not passed them and lost a whole bunch of market share and third party support.
Lets be clear. Your the one not looking at all the facts. I am.
kowenicki said:
|
Well it's not 'for sure' that the gap is over 1 million, for that to be true the PS3 would need to have over 500,000 more consoles sat on store shelves compared to the 360 for that to be true.
easyrider said:
Units sold don't mean shit if you lost 5 billion dollars. "Sony has lost ~5 billion dollars on the PS3. It is the worst financial disaster in gaming history, losing more money for its parent company than either the Dreamcast or original Xbox." So I'm delusional. YOu only care about how many moved units, nothing else. Wow talk about hearing what you want to hear. not the business end. WTF do you think they are doing it for? YOU!!! Lolololol. It's for money. For a company that moved 155 million units last gen. They should have passed MS in the first year however they still have not passed them and lost a whole bunch of market share and third party support.
Lets be clear. Your the one not looking at all the facts. I am.
|
Lol nope, just because the competition last gen failed miserably to finish above the PS2 doesn't change the fact that this gen the 360 will end up finishing behind the PS3 and now the Wii has dropped like a rock the PS3 has a chance of outselling that as well. A win's still a win wether you like it or not.
And yet again you talk about gaining third party support, so what? That's what happens when you do so badly in the previous gen, the PS3 hasn't lost anything that matters, it still has the best library of core games.
When all is said and done the PS3 will have outsold the 360, either outsold or come close to the wii, have the most amount of million sellers, will have sold the most amount of consoles per year on sale, will have sold the most amount of software per year on sale, will have the most amount of top rated games and will have introduced more top selling and top rated new core ips than anybody else. And it will have done all of this whilst launching a year after the 360 in Japan and America, a year and a half after the 360 in Europe/half a year later than the Wii in Europe, and all whilst being launched at $600 considerably more expensive than the competition.
Yep, just the facts.
If the PS3 was shipping so well, you'd think Sony would post it's numbers separately from the PS2. Odd to clump them together all the sudden in the last year or so.
| nightsurge said: If the PS3 was shipping so well, you'd think Sony would post it's numbers separately from the PS2. Odd to clump them together all the sudden in the last year or so. |
They do that because they want to hide the Vita numbers which are very poor, they can't clump together the Vita and PSP numbers without doing the same for the PS2/PS3.
The gap is too small to be significant now.
And 360 is the slowest selling console.


| Wh1pL4shL1ve_007 said: Wait, is there actually an adjustment? Or not? |
I'm guessing not. PS3 weekly sales were added and the bar went up, that's all.
Same for Vita, the bar was frozen at 4.1M now it finally managed to crawl up to 4.2M (selling about 25k per week takes 4 weeks to move 0.1 in the bar... sigh).

