easyrider said:
Units sold don't mean shit if you lost 5 billion dollars. "Sony has lost ~5 billion dollars on the PS3. It is the worst financial disaster in gaming history, losing more money for its parent company than either the Dreamcast or original Xbox." So I'm delusional. YOu only care about how many moved units, nothing else. Wow talk about hearing what you want to hear. not the business end. WTF do you think they are doing it for? YOU!!! Lolololol. It's for money. For a company that moved 155 million units last gen. They should have passed MS in the first year however they still have not passed them and lost a whole bunch of market share and third party support.
Lets be clear. Your the one not looking at all the facts. I am.
|
Lol nope, just because the competition last gen failed miserably to finish above the PS2 doesn't change the fact that this gen the 360 will end up finishing behind the PS3 and now the Wii has dropped like a rock the PS3 has a chance of outselling that as well. A win's still a win wether you like it or not.
And yet again you talk about gaining third party support, so what? That's what happens when you do so badly in the previous gen, the PS3 hasn't lost anything that matters, it still has the best library of core games.
When all is said and done the PS3 will have outsold the 360, either outsold or come close to the wii, have the most amount of million sellers, will have sold the most amount of consoles per year on sale, will have sold the most amount of software per year on sale, will have the most amount of top rated games and will have introduced more top selling and top rated new core ips than anybody else. And it will have done all of this whilst launching a year after the 360 in Japan and America, a year and a half after the 360 in Europe/half a year later than the Wii in Europe, and all whilst being launched at $600 considerably more expensive than the competition.
Yep, just the facts.







