By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Is the PS4 TOO powerful? I think it is and I'm worried about Sony.

newwil7l said:
pokoko said:

If you flip a coin three times and it lands on tails each time, have you proven that coins can only land on tails?



In this case it is 7 times. 11 if you include the handheld races

Look, if you really believe that's the deciding factor, that price, games, marketing, brand identity, launch timing, none of that have any effect, then that's fine with me.  Personally, until I hear someone say, "no, I don't want that console, it's too powerful," I'll believe that there are many more aspects involved.



Around the Network
pokoko said:
newwil7l said:
pokoko said:

If you flip a coin three times and it lands on tails each time, have you proven that coins can only land on tails?



In this case it is 7 times. 11 if you include the handheld races

Look, if you really believe that's the deciding factor, that price, games, marketing, brand identity, launch timing, none of that have any effect, then that's fine with me.  Personally, until I hear someone say, "no, I don't want that console, it's too powerful," I'll believe that there are many more aspects involved.

The more powerfull, the more expensive. That's the simple problem with too much power.

The average consumer thinks price first, then the features that price could deliver. You know: for that kind of money, i could get this or that... hmmm... interesting or no thanks...



In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.

pokoko said:
newwil7l said:
pokoko said:

If you flip a coin three times and it lands on tails each time, have you proven that coins can only land on tails?



In this case it is 7 times. 11 if you include the handheld races

Look, if you really believe that's the deciding factor, that price, games, marketing, brand identity, launch timing, none of that have any effect, then that's fine with me.  Personally, until I hear someone say, "no, I don't want that console, it's too powerful," I'll believe that there are many more aspects involved.


I agree. The main deciding factor on a console's fate is not power, but a combination of the above.

Power is nice to have, but coincidence or not, every generation the most powerful console missed one or more of the other aspects. Let' look at the weak points of every most powerful console of its gen:

Master System - didn't come close to NES' third party support.
Neo Geo - insane price, not nearly as much third party support as Genesis and Super NES.
Nintendo 64 - lolcartridges, third party support flocked to PlayStation.
Xbox/Gamecube - late to the market, third party support again all on PlayStation 2.
PlayStation 3 - insane price, late to the market, hugely successful competitor (Wii), shared third party support with Xbox 360, hard to develop for.

Third party support is without a doubt a very strong indicator of who will win a gen. The PS3 is the exception as a console who retained 3rd party support but had far too many other problems (and a too successful competitor on Wii).

Overall I agree with pokoko. I think it is a matter of time until we see a gen won by the most powerful console - it seems it was a matter of luck (or lack of) in the past generations in that the most powerful machine was always plagued by some other huge problem that brought it down.

If the PS4 will break this rule (assuming it remains more powerful than Xbox 720), time will tell.



Sensei said:
pokoko said:
newwil7l said:
pokoko said:

If you flip a coin three times and it lands on tails each time, have you proven that coins can only land on tails?



In this case it is 7 times. 11 if you include the handheld races

Look, if you really believe that's the deciding factor, that price, games, marketing, brand identity, launch timing, none of that have any effect, then that's fine with me.  Personally, until I hear someone say, "no, I don't want that console, it's too powerful," I'll believe that there are many more aspects involved.


I agree. The main deciding factor on a console's fate is not power, but a combination of the above.

Power is nice to have, but coincidence or not, every generation the most powerful console missed one or more of the other aspects. Let' look at the weak points of every most powerful console of its gen:

Master System - didn't come close to NES' third party support.
Neo Geo - insane price, not nearly as much third party support as Genesis and Super NES.
Nintendo 64 - lolcartridges, third party support flocked to PlayStation.
Xbox/Gamecube - late to the market, third party support again all on PlayStation 2.
PlayStation 3 - insane price, late to the market, hugely successful competitor (Wii), shared third party support with Xbox 360, hard to develop for.

Third party support is without a doubt a very strong indicator of who will win a gen. The PS3 is the exception as a console who retained 3rd party support but had far too many other problems (and a too successful competitor on Wii).

Overall I agree with pokoko. I think it is a matter of time until we see a gen won by the most powerful console - it seems it was a matter of luck (or lack of) in the past generations in that the most powerful machine was always plagued by some other huge problem that brought it down.

If the PS4 will break this rule (assuming it remains more powerful than Xbox 720), time will tell.

PS3 could still break this rule if it ends up outselling Wii in the end




Get Your Portable ID!Lord of Ratchet and Clank

Duke of Playstation Plus

Warden of Platformers

Miguel_Zorro said:
Otakumegane said:
I like your little stealth trolling at the WiiU in there.

What I think is, unless they have the $$ to magically make PS4 $399 or less, it will be too expensive.


Saying that the Wii U is technologically inferior to the PS4 isn't stealth trolling.  Depending on your point of view, you'd argue that it's either a statement of fact or straight up trolling.

On Topic: The PS3 had two problems that were related to this which caused it problems early on.

1) It was difficult to program for

2) It was too expensive for the average consumer.

#1 won't be a problem this time since they've gone with more standard PC hardware.  Programming for the PS4, new XBox and PC will be relatively similar this time around.

It all depends on #2.  If they launch with $599 models again, things will not go well.  As people have said, if they launch at $399, they'll be fine.  They *might* be ok at $449, but that could be pushing it.  I don't this it's necessary to go lower - such as $349 or $299 - in the short term.  Not when they'll still be selling the PS3 for $199.

I'm still expecting two launch packages - one at $399 and one at $499.  Bundles will vary depending on the individual retailer.  They will be some Sony packaged  bundles, but some retailers like Best Buy will throw a random game in.

I agree with all your points because I'm busy at the moment.



http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/profile/92109/nintendopie/ Nintendopie  Was obviously right and I was obviously wrong. I will forever be a lesser being than them. (6/16/13)