Oh my

If you like those out of context than you might like these:

kain_kusanagi on 12/05/12 "I don't want to divert this thread any more than it already has. My original point was that PS+ isn't as valuable to some as it is to others. I'm glad you like it. I'm not interested. I've stated why enough."

kain_kusanagi on 08/30/10 "They've added a lot of stuff like ESPN and such. Personally I'd like a subscription rate for people who play less than 5 hours a week. There could be a Platinum XBL at $59.99 for unlimited gameplay and services and a limited Gold XBL subscription for people like me who don't play that much but still want to play from time to time for say $19.99. Silver would still be free. The only paid service I use besides the occasional game of Halo Firefight with my brothers is Netflix and that could be like small additional fee for silver and gold users and standard with Platinum. MS would never do that, but that's what I'd like."

OH my goodness!!! I came back to this thread to see why it was suddently getting so many posts all of a sudden but this is hilarious. I find it ironic how the whole thread started off so hot because the OP called others out by labelling them as hypocrites in the title. And now this.

lol, I am not carrying it around, I saw the OP and remembered it. Some people see value in XBL and you are one of those people, good for you. Now try to understand why some believe that PSN+ and Apple products are worh their money.

EDIT: Forget about PSN+ , you clarified that above.

try to spin in how ever you want, doesnt change what you said. or the different opinions you keep having. this threas was created (before the tittle changed) to point out the hypocrisy in people on this forum, when you yourself are guilty of doing it.

and reply with what ever picture you want, doesnt change the fact that that was one of the best burns i ever seen

Actually if Sony gets many people to join PSN Plus it will be a very profitable venture. Patcher was talking about this on Gametrailers. He was alluding to them planting a seed and waiting for it to grow, which seems to be happening in spades. 

Please, pray tell, explain how PS+ and XBLG are the same and an opinion of one invalidates an opinion of the other.

Since you like out of context quotes try these on for size:

kain_kusanagi on 12/05/12 "I don't want to divert this thread any more than it already has. My original point was that PS+ isn't as valuable to some as it is to others. I'm glad you like it. I'm not interested. I've stated why enough."

kain_kusanagi on 08/30/10 "They've added a lot of stuff like ESPN and such. Personally I'd like a subscription rate for people who play less than 5 hours a week. There could be a Platinum XBL at $59.99 for unlimited gameplay and services and a limited Gold XBL subscription for people like me who don't play that much but still want to play from time to time for say $19.99. Silver would still be free. The only paid service I use besides the occasional game of Halo Firefight with my brothers is Netflix and that could be like small additional fee for silver and gold users and standard with Platinum. MS would never do that, but that's what I'd like."

At the end of the day you can't play Halo 4 on PSN and paying for PS+ doesn't bring Halo 4 over either. That's the meat of this topic. People complain about XBLG and say PSN has everything that XBLG has. But if you want to play Halo 4 then you need XBLG. Apparently nobody is alowed to say this if they don't LOVE PS+ and do this

for the games Sony picks out for you.

If that's  how you see it here's a link to a shirt you might want to buy: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/eb9a/

PS+ =/= XBLG

Kain_kusanagi you should stop posting already. You are making yourself look bad. We are basically comparing at the moment PSN with Xbox live. Basically PSn does everything that Xbox live does and for free. PSN+ offers a lot more for a cheaper fee and it is optional. So at this point we should be focusing on PSN, Nintendo, Steam which provide a free service.

Why do you keep bringing Halo up? Doesn't make sense. The topic  here is " Is it worth to pay for something that you can get for free on any other platform" and you start talking about PS players can't get Halo. Another example how you lack arguments and just throwing random stuff here and there trying to justify this? I would respected you more, but with the Halo posts. No words.

You're conflating exclusive games with the services/functions LIVE, PSN, Steam, etc give.

People are saying that functions that you get for free on the PSN or Steam, should not be charged for by Microsoft.

If you buy, say, BF3 on the PS3 or PC, you can play online without paying anything on top of the price of the game. If you buy BF3 on the 360, you need to pay for LIVE to play it.

As I brought up earlier, Microsoft doesn't actually host the games or own the servers. So what justifies them to charge you the money? To me, it seems like they're really just taking hostage a basic and key function to extract more money, when they're not hosting the servers that the games are actually played on (ignoring P2P games like CoD).