pezus said:
Depends on where you look. You've got nothing like this in Crysis:
|
That part looks great, but the less open areas look plain compared to Crysis.


pezus said:
Depends on where you look. You've got nothing like this in Crysis:
|
That part looks great, but the less open areas look plain compared to Crysis.
| Roma said: looks good but if they bothered to put frogs in the game they might as well add water splashes when they are jumping in the water |
Same could be said about Crysis showing turtles walking on 2 legs. Apparently, nature is too difficult to replicate.
KHlover said:
This PC would cost around 600-650€ for max. settings. Take into account the loss the Nextbox will be sold at and you'll actually end up with comparable prices^^ |
What are you talking about? A HD7970, Core i7-2600k mainboard and memory already cost $700. Than you have to add a pc case and power-supply, Blu-Ray player, controller/mouse and keyboard etc. and you're at $900. And then you should probably also add a legal version of WIndows 7/8 to keep it fair so that's another $100.
All in all $900-$1000 and then you still have to build it yourself, and it will no way look as good as a console. And it doesn't matter if the Nextbox is sold at a loss, you as a customer will only pay $400 for it tops.
sethnintendo said:
Same could be said about Crysis 2 showing turtles walking on 2 legs. Apparently, nature is too difficult to replicate. |
haha didn't know that
| R.I.P Mr Iwata :'( | ||
![]() |
|
|


pezus said:
That's because it's a city >_> Do you expect a rainforest inside a city or what? This part shows off the graphics amazingly. |
Yes it does, and it looks superb, but it's also an on rails cinematic, while the Crysis 3 gameplay we're talking about is not.
And a city can still have intricate detail.


Roma said:
haha didn't know that |
Pfft, Crytek are ridiculously behind, Yoshi's Island had little frogs jumping around in the scenery back on the SNES in 1995, and they actually made splashes when they landed in the water. :p
Pretty sad that even with the OMG 8 GIGS OF GDDR5 that it can't do 1080p x 60 fps.
What's even more annoying is every lemming hyping it, even though the only thing that matters in the end is not theoretical numbers, but FPS and image quality, which the PC has already beaten years ago.
-this user was warned for this post by amp316
Roma said:
haha didn't know that |
Actually, I suppose this is Crysis 1 but it might as well be 2... Just look at the turtle at 30 secs in. Just goes to show that even with the "best" graphics, games can still look stupid.
| youarebadatgames said: Pretty sad that even with the OMG 8 GIGS OF GDDR5 that it can't do 1080p x 60 fps. What's even more annoying is every lemming hyping it, even though the only thing that matters in the end is not theoretical numbers, but FPS and image quality, which the PC has already beaten years ago. |
Killzone was made with 4GB ram, the game is still 8 months from release. Who are you calling a lemming now?


RazorDragon said:
Agreed. But that screen was released anyway by Sony, so I was just saying that based on the screen released now, not on the release date of the Killzone game, that PC games/Crysis 3 look much better, at least technically. Which is a fact now, but may change in the future. |
No, this wasn't released by Sony. This is just some person finding the worst possible spot to take a screepcap from some low-res Youtube video.