By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - holy shi! ps4 8gb of GDDR5

So glad Sony went all out.



Around the Network

I meant no harm or show fanboyish in my post i was just stating facts to people who falsely give the next gen crown to the PS4 due just to power alone which should be the more powerful system (2nd to the PC of course) due to the history behind the more powerful consoles. To reply to the Wii not winning last gen comment i must say is a false statement it has by far won with nearly 100 million sold but i will be the first to say the Wii in no way shape or form was a gamer's choice with only a handful of games worth playing IMO out of all the shovelware aimed towards the casual crowd but hey a win is a win in my book.

To get back on topic Sony has IMO dug a hole and possible a grave with this PS4 due to serval factors...

Price Point
Loss Per System
(Rumor) No Used Games

These 3 factors go hand in hand for a console to be successful because Price Point and No used Games = loss in sales of the system and Loss Per System only works if the console sells a giant amount equaling game sales to make up for the loss. I in no way can see this PS4 being less then 500 due to the hardware inside this power house console and even then id say it will be sold at a loss so any lower then 500 will result in too much of a loss and due to Sony's economic state at the current moment they need to sell a system at a gain not a loss! They could have easily cut some corners and still be "Next Gen" power house,compete with the consoles power not PCs Sony! Are the games for this system gonna be $60 or will they go up $70 or maybe even $80?



SpartenOmega117 said:
thismeintiel said:
SpartenOmega117 said:


Yes I understand that but I really think Sony should have gone maybe 4gb ddr5 for gaming purposes and maybe 4gb ddr3 for everything else. Sure in the long run it may be beneficial but wasn't the cell supposed to be beneficial in the long run too? I'm just thinking that Sony might be digging themselves in a financial hole again. If Durango specs hold true then it is likely that Microsoft can easily launch for $100 less than ps4 which may be fatal. If Sony plays hard ball and decide to match whatever price Microsoft sets then they will lose quite a bit of money for each unit sold. 

Fatal?  The PS3 launched for $200 more than the 360 and 1 year later.  1 1/2 years later in EU, one of Sony's most important regions.  How did that turn out?  Sony is about to pass the 360 sometime this year (probably in 2-3 quarters).  So, now we have the PS4 launching the same year as the NeXbox, and it might be $100 more expensive (I'm guessing $50-$75 will be more accurate).  MS doesn't stand a chance in EU and Japan.

Yes it would be fatal. The probably reason. Why they sold a ton of ps3 early anyways was due to the fact that I was the successor to the ps2, the most successful home console of all time. Even with that Sony dug themselves in a hole with that price. Or did you forget the yeary $100 price cut, millions of dollars in the red, the lost market share, etc. I'm sure that even a financial analyst working at Sony would call the ps3 a glorious failure. They did manage to turn it around in the end though. But that doesn't take away from the fact that the ps3 is a failure. 

I really don't think that gddr5 is that more expensive than ddr3. 2gb gddr5 cards only cost $5-8 more than their 1gb counterparts, and that's at retail. I'm expecting the PS4 to be $50 more expensive than the next xbox, and maybe even with very cheap PS4/Vita bundles.

Also the PS3 was $500 for the cheapest model. It uses XDR memory wich at the time probably costs more than GDDR5 costs now. The Blu-Ray drive was very expensive to produce back then, up to $180 for the drive alone. Besides Durango is rumored to have a Blu-Ray drive aswell. Also the Cell was expensivel, probably more expensive than the cpu the PS4 is going to use.



That's more then i thought. A bit of a mixed blessing.

There is no way they can sell the PS4 without a loss. Because of their financial and the general economical state, i expected them to push less specs, less loss and perhaps even a profit.

It's almost garanteed Sony will be pushing a +/-$500 dollar system in a slow (depressed) economy; which could even get worse.
And if they have to take a $100 loss on every console sold for the next 2 year, boy that's bad. If it's even more, then it's just awful.

Sony seems to be betting the future of their entire gaming division on the PS4. Bold move...




In the wilderness we go alone with our new knowledge and strength.

Sorry I'm so late to the party. I slept through the entire presentation. Just read all the recaps and big news.

The system sounds like it has some jaw-dropping horsepower, but does anyone have any insight as to the kind of price tag this tech will necessitate?



Around the Network
Veknoid_Outcast said:
Sorry I'm so late to the party. I slept through the entire presentation. Just read all the recaps and big news.

The system sounds like it has some jaw-dropping horsepower, but does anyone have any insight as to the kind of price tag this tech will necessitate?


Sony themselves havn't said anything about the price. You'll just see peoples guesses if you look now :p



Baron said:
drkohler said:
Baron said:
Turkish said:

GPU is average? lmao, a 7970M=HD7870, so no not average at all

Where has it been said its a 7970m? I must have missed the part where they went into detail about the parts of the console.

Very few things were said hardware-wise. Eight core CPU was mentioned, customised gpu as far as I can remenber.

The only thing they said was very likely wrong. The guy said something like "CPU plus GPU on the same die". What he probably meant was a SOC type design (chips on the same _chip carrier_). As AMD doesn't make eight core processors, the CPU likely is two quad core Jaguar CPUs with interconnecting glue logic on one die, and the GPU on the other die (supposedly the GPU is heavily customised as the presenter also hinted). The next XBox probably uses the same CPU assembly or each of the two competitors added their own glue logic wishes. As the Jaguar is not exactly a high end cpu. the design of the glue logic probably decides who has the better cpu in the end. Apparently the Jaguar scales much better when overclocked than previous AMD processors, either Sony or MS could turn that screw a little to "win".

Expensice stuff in the end. I'd guess $529 for a full PS4 and $449 for a "light" version..

I know, I just wanted to know where Turkish got his nonsense from.

As for the CPU plus GPU on the same die bit, won't the Jaguar have an integrated GPU?

 

And the latest rumours suggest $430 for the base model and $530 for the premium model.


Its not nonsense, the rumor of 7970M is the same one that said PS4 would have a Share button, touchpad, 8 core cpu and 4GB GDDR5 ram, so yes in all probability the 7970M rumor is also true.



Shinobi-san said:
So much bullshit in this thread.

Seriously guys the specs have already been confirmed. Not sure what the arguments are about.

And anybody calling these specs weak/average/underpowered are seriously out of touch with reality.

^^ This



I predict that the Wii U will sell a total of 18 million units in its lifetime. 

The NX will be a 900p machine

ninjablade said:
holy shit just watched the kill zone video, its already the best looking game ever, including anything on pc.

Wrong, just wrong. It looks good but.... WRONG.



I predict that the Wii U will sell a total of 18 million units in its lifetime. 

The NX will be a 900p machine

Pesmerga7551 said:
Graphically, it will rival the HD 6950. I am kinda disappointed with the news that its graphical output is 2 Teraflops. For instance, the HD 6950 is at 2.25 TF, and the old HD 5870 is at 2.75 TF. Not sure if it's the graphical leap we were all expecting. The x86, 8 core made sense, as well as the 8GB GDDR5 memory to allow any future features to come when they are developed. No limitations. They did well on this. Just very skeptical on the GPU.


You should be more worried about the CPU. The 8 Jaguar cores from AMD compete with Intel Atom in performance.